Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32405422›Full record

ArticleJournal of virus eradication2020

Review of safety and minimum pricing of nitazoxanide for potential treatment of COVID-19.

Toby Pepperrell, Victoria Pilkington, Andrew Owen, Junzheng Wang, Andrew M Hill

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virus eradication, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04552483 phase2completednot on this map

Effects of Nitazoxanide Administration to Patients in the Initial Phase of COVID-19

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroRan2020 to 2020Enrolled392ConditionsCovid19, CoronavirusArmsNitazoxanide, Placebo
NCT04561219 phase2completednot on this map

Nitazoxanide for Moderate to Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia: a Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroRan2020 to 2020Enrolled500ConditionsCovid19, Corona Virus Infection, Pneumonia, ViralArmsNitazoxanide, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Disease-drug and drug-drug interaction in COVID-19: Risk and assessment.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Potential drug targets of SARS-CoV-2: From genomics to therapeutics.International journal of biological macromolecules · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Toby PepperrellFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK.
Victoria PilkingtonImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust.
Andrew OwenDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, UK.
Junzheng WangFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK.
Andrew M HillDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, UK.
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany treatments are being assessed for repurposing to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). One drug that has shown promising results

methodsA review of nitazoxanide clinical research was conducted using EMBASE and MEDLINE databases, supplemented by ClinicalTrials.gov. We searched for phase 2 or 3 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing nitazoxanide with placebo or active control for 5-14 days in participants experiencing acute infections of any kind. Data extracted were grade 1-4 and serious adverse events (AEs). Data were also extracted on gastrointestinal (GI) AEs, as well as hepatorenal and cardiovascular effects.Active pharmaceutical ingredient cost data from 2016 to 2019 were extracted from the Panjiva database and adjusted for 5% loss during production, costs of excipients, formulation, a 10% profit margin and tax. Two dosages, at 500 mg BD and a higher dose of 1100 mg three times daily (TDS), were considered. Our estimated costs were compared with publicly available list prices from a selection of countries.

resultsNine RCTs of nitazoxanide were identified for inclusion. These RCTs accounted for 1514 participants and an estimated 95.3 person-years-of-follow-up. No significant differences were found in any of the AE endpoints assessed, across all trials or on subgroup analyses of active- or placebo-controlled trials. Mild GI AEs increased with dose. No hepatorenal or cardiovascular concerns were raised, but few appropriate metrics were reported. There were no teratogenic concerns, but the evidence base was very limited.Based on a weighted-mean cost of US $61/kg, a 14-day course of treatment with nitazoxanide 500 mg BD would cost $1.41. The daily cost would therefore be $0.10. The same 14-day course could cost $3944 in US commercial pharmacies, and $3 per course in Pakistan, India and Bangladesh. At a higher dose of 1100 mg TDS, our estimated cost was $4.08 per 14-day course, equivalent to $0.29 per day.

conclusionNitazoxanide demonstrates a good safety profile at approved doses. However, further evidence is required regarding hepatorenal and cardiovascular effects, as well as teratogenicity. We estimate that it would be possible to manufacture nitazoxanide as generic for $1.41 for a 14-day treatment course at 500 mg BD, up to $4.08 at 1100 mg TDS. Further trials in COVID-19 patients should be initiated. If efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 is demonstrated in clinical studies, nitazoxanide may represent a safe and affordable treatment in the ongoing pandemic.

Identifiers

PMID32405422
PMCPMC7332204
OpenAlexW3025401836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.