Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32405286›Full record

ArticleCEUR workshop proceedings2018

Personalizing Mobile Fitness Apps using Reinforcement Learning.

Mo Zhou, Yonatan Mintz, Yoshimi Fukuoka, Ken Goldberg, Elena Flowers, Philip Kaminsky, Alejandro Castillejo, Anil Aswani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CEUR workshop proceedings, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Replicable Bandits for Digital Health Interventions.Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Deployed Online Reinforcement Learning Algorithm In An Oral Health Clinical Trial.Proceedings of the ... AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Reinforcement Learning Interventions on Boundedly Rational Human Agents in Frictionful Tasks.Proceedings of the ... International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems : AAMAS. International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Behavioral Analytics for Myopic Agents.European journal of operational research · 2023
    Article
  18. Reward Design For An Online Reinforcement Learning Algorithm Supporting Oral Self-Care.Proceedings of the ... Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference. Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference · 2023
    Article
  19. Machine Learning in Nutrition Research.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022
    Article
  20. Data-driven Interpretable Policy Construction for Personalized Mobile Health.IEEE International Conference on Digital Health. IEEE International Conference on Digital Health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mo ZhouDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Yonatan MintzDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Yoshimi FukuokaDepartment of Physiological Nursing Institute for Health & Aging, School of Nursing University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ken GoldbergDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Elena FlowersDepartment of Physiological Nursing, School of Nursing University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Philip KaminskyDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Alejandro CastillejoDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Anil AswaniDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Funding

Clinical and Transtional Science InstituteKL2TR000143 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GRANDIS, JENNIFER RUBIN · 2012 to 2015
$11.9M
Mentoring and research in applying digital technologies to prevent chronic IllnessesK24NR015812 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FUKUOKA, YOSHIMI · 2015 to 2020
$930k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000143NINR NIH HHS K24 NR015812
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the vast number of mobile fitness applications (apps) and their potential advantages in promoting physical activity, many existing apps lack behavior-change features and are not able to maintain behavior change motivation. This paper describes a novel fitness app called CalFit, which implements important behavior-change features like dynamic goal setting and self-monitoring. CalFit uses a reinforcement learning algorithm to generate personalized daily step goals that are challenging but attainable. We conducted the Mobile Student Activity Reinforcement (mSTAR) study with 13 college students to evaluate the efficacy of the CalFit app. The control group (receiving goals of 10,000 steps/day) had a decrease in daily step count of 1,520 (SD ± 740) between baseline and 10-weeks, compared to an increase of 700 (SD ± 830) in the intervention group (receiving personalized step goals). The difference in daily steps between the two groups was 2,220, with a statistically significant

Indexed as

fitness appgoal settinginterface designmobile apppersonalizationPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID32405286
PMCPMC7220419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.