Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32405271›Full record

ArticleUncertainty in artificial intelligence : proceedings of the ... conference. Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence2019

Sampling-free Uncertainty Estimation in Gated Recurrent Units with Applications to Normative Modeling in Neuroimaging.

Seong Jae Hwang, Ronak R Mehta, Hyunwoo J Kim, Sterling C Johnson, Vikas Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Uncertainty in artificial intelligence : proceedings of the ... conference. Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Seong Jae HwangDept. of Computer Sciences, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison.
Ronak R MehtaDept. of Computer Sciences, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison.
Hyunwoo J KimDept. of Computer Science and Engineering, Korea University.
Sterling C JohnsonDept. of Medicine, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison.
Vikas SinghDept. of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison.

Funding

Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention: Sex Differences in DNA MethylationR01AG027161 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Nathaniel Ark Chin, Sterling C Johnson · 2007 to 2026
$35.6M
Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG062715 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI AMY J. KIND · 2019 to 2026
$34.5M
The Longitudinal Course of Neural Function and Amyloid in People At Risk for ADR01AG021155 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Sterling C Johnson · 2004 to 2026
$27.0M
Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP50AG033514 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CHAPPELL, RICHARD J · 2009 to 2018
$16.2M
TrainingU54AI117924 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CRAVEN, MARK W. · 2014 to 2018
$11.3M
Algebraic Formulations for Characterizing Structural Brain Connectivity Changes and Pathology Transmission Networks in Preclinical Alzheimer's DiseaseRF1AG059312 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BENDLIN, BARBARA BRIGITTA, SINGH, VIKAS · 2019 to 2019
$1.8M
Bio-Data Science Training ProgramT32LM012413 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DEWEY, COLIN NOEL, GOULD, MICHAEL N · 2016 to 2020
$1.5M
Maximizing Power in AD Clinical Trials via Multimodal Machine LearningR01AG040396 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SINGH, VIKAS · 2012 to 2015
$1.1M
Manifold-valued statistical models for longitudinal morphometic analysis in preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD)R01EB022883 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI JOHNSON, STERLING C, SINGH, VIKAS · 2016 to 2018
$995k
CRCNS: Pooling Multisite data and Staistical Tests for analyzing biomarkers of Alzheimer's diseaseRF1AG062336 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SINGH, VIKAS · 2018 to 2018
$660k
NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI117924NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062715NIA NIH HHS P50 AG033514NIA NIH HHS R01 AG021155NIA NIH HHS R01 AG027161NIA NIH HHS R01 AG040396NIA NIH HHS R01 AG059312NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG059312NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG062336NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022883NLM NIH HHS T32 LM012413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has recently been a concerted effort to derive mechanisms in vision and machine learning systems to offer uncertainty estimates of the predictions they make. Clearly, there are benefits to a system that is not only accurate but also has a sense for when it is not. Existing proposals center around Bayesian interpretations of modern deep architectures - these are effective but can often be computationally demanding. We show how classical ideas in the literature on exponential families on probabilistic networks provide an excellent starting point to derive uncertainty estimates in Gated Recurrent Units (GRU). Our proposal directly quantifies uncertainty

Identifiers

PMID32405271
PMCPMC7220220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.