ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma
Audit changes practice-a simple education intervention can lead to better outcome in ankle fracture surgery.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient reported outcomes after revision ankle fixation.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnstable ankle fractures are common, and majority requires open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). There is emerging evidence that the rate of malreduction has remained high despite advances in surgical techniques and implants. Malreduced ankle is a prominent cause of post-traumatic ankle arthritis leading to poor patient reported outcome. The aim of this study was to investigate the quality of anatomical reduction and surgical fixation of ankle fractures and the impact of simple education intervention on the quality of reduction of these fractures. METHODOLOGY: An audit cycle was completed in two phases; retrospective review (phase 1) of 114 cases operated prior to an education intervention using infographic posters and then a prospective (phase 2) review of 96 consecutive cases operated after the education intervention. Data including age, fracture morphology, time to surgery, and the quality of reduction were assessed. The quality of anatomical reduction was evaluated using radiological parameters described by Pettrone. Paediatric, Weber A, pathological and open fractures were excluded. Education interventions included regional teaching and dissemination of infographic posters. Mann- Whitney
resultsPhase one cohort showed malreduced fixation in 25% of cases. Inadequate restoration of fibular length was the most common type of malreduction. After implementation of education intervention, malreduction rate reduced to 9.4% in phase 2 (p = 0.015). There were no significant differences between age, gender, and time to surgery between phase one and two.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that simple education intervention can lead to better understanding of fixation and decrease the rate of malreduction of these fractures. We recommend that using Pettrone's radiological criteria in correction of corresponding anatomy of ankle fracture is a useful tool to avoid malreduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.