Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32405158›Full record

ArticleClinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))2020

Reduced Fractionation in Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Curative-intent Radiotherapy during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

C Faivre-Finn, J D Fenwick, K N Franks, S Harrow, M Q F Hatton, C Hiley, J J McAleese, F McDonald, J O'Hare, C Peedell and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Managing cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: an ESMO multidisciplinary expert consensus.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2020
    Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The National Lung Cancer Audit: The Impact of COVID-19.Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. HypofractionatedJournal of thoracic disease · 2022
    Article
  18. Tailored treatment strategies for cancer patients during COVID-19 pandemic.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2022
    Review
  19. Radiotherapy during the COVID-19: a review about management and treatment strategies.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

C Faivre-FinnThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Electronic address: Corinne.Finn@christie.nhs.uk.
J D FenwickDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Physics, Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Bebington, Wirral, UK.
K N FranksLeeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK; University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
S HarrowBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
M Q F HattonWeston Park Hospital, Broomhall, Sheffield, UK.
C HileyCRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London, London, UK; Department of Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
J J McAleeseNorthern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, UK.
F McDonaldThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
J O'HareNorthern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, UK.
C PeedellJames Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
T PopeClatterbridge Cancer Centre, Bebington, Wirral, UK.
C PowellSouth West Wales Cancer Centre, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, UK; Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK.
R RulachBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
E ToyRoyal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK.
Belfast City Hospital · GBBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre · GBClatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust · GBJames Cook University Hospital · GBRoyal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBSingleton Hospital · GBThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBWeston Park Cancer Centre · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 28990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients treated with curative-intent lung radiotherapy are in the group at highest risk of severe complications and death from COVID-19. There is therefore an urgent need to reduce the risks associated with multiple hospital visits and their anti-cancer treatment. One recommendation is to consider alternative dose-fractionation schedules or radiotherapy techniques. This would also increase radiotherapy service capacity for operable patients with stage I-III lung cancer, who might be unable to have surgery during the pandemic. Here we identify reduced-fractionation for curative-intent radiotherapy regimes in lung cancer, from a literature search carried out between 20/03/2020 and 30/03/2020 as well as published and unpublished audits of hypofractionated regimes from UK centres. Evidence, practical considerations and limitations are discussed for early-stage NSCLC, stage III NSCLC, early-stage and locally advanced SCLC. We recommend discussion of this guidance document with other specialist lung MDT members to disseminate the potential changes to radiotherapy practices that could be made to reduce pressure on other departments such as thoracic surgery. It is also a crucial part of the consent process to ensure that the risks and benefits of undergoing cancer treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic and the uncertainties surrounding toxicity from reduced fractionation have been adequately discussed with patients. Furthermore, centres should document all deviations from standard protocols, and we urge all colleagues, where possible, to join national/international data collection initiatives (such as COVID-RT Lung) aimed at recording the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on lung cancer treatment and outcomes.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusDose Fractionation, RadiationCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungClinical Trials as TopicCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansLung NeoplasmsMeta-Analysis as TopicPandemicsPneumonia, ViralPractice Guidelines as TopicRisk ManagementSARS-CoV-2Small Cell Lung CarcinomaSystematic Reviews as TopicCOVID-19fractionationlung cancerradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID32405158
PMCPMC7218369
OpenAlexW3024779799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.