Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32405053›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2020

Preparing samples from whole cells using focused-ion-beam milling for cryo-electron tomography.

Felix R Wagner, Reika Watanabe, Ruud Schampers, Digvijay Singh, Hans Persoon, Miroslava Schaffer, Peter Fruhstorfer, Jürgen Plitzko, Elizabeth Villa

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed
15.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 206 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Felix R Wagner *Section of Molecular Biology, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Reika Watanabe *Section of Molecular Biology, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Ruud SchampersThermo Fisher Scientific, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Digvijay SinghSection of Molecular Biology, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Hans PersoonThermo Fisher Scientific, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Miroslava SchafferDepartment of Molecular Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.
Peter FruhstorferThermo Fisher Scientific, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Jürgen PlitzkoDepartment of Molecular Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6402-8315
Elizabeth VillaSection of Molecular Biology, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. evilla@ucsd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4677-9809
University of California San Diego · USMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry · DEThermo Fisher Scientific (Netherlands) · NLEppendorf (Germany) · DE

Funding

Opening Windows into the Cell: Revealing the Molecular Architecture of the Nuclear PeripheryDP2GM123494 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI VILLA, ELIZABETH · 2016 to 2019
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS DP2 GM123494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances have made cryogenic (cryo) electron microscopy a key technique to achieve near-atomic-resolution structures of biochemically isolated macromolecular complexes. Cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) can give unprecedented insight into these complexes in the context of their natural environment. However, the application of cryo-ET is limited to samples that are thinner than most cells, thereby considerably reducing its applicability. Cryo-focused-ion-beam (cryo-FIB) milling has been used to carve (micromachining) out 100-250-nm-thin regions (called lamella) in the intact frozen cells. This procedure opens a window into the cells for high-resolution cryo-ET and structure determination of biomolecules in their native environment. Further combination with fluorescence microscopy allows users to determine cells or regions of interest for the targeted fabrication of lamellae and cryo-ET imaging. Here, we describe how to prepare lamellae using a microscope equipped with both FIB and scanning electron microscopy modalities. Such microscopes (Aquilos Cryo-FIB/Scios/Helios or CrossBeam) are routinely referred to as dual-beam microscopes, and they are equipped with a cryo-stage for all operations in cryogenic conditions. The basic principle of the described methodologies is also applicable for other types of dual-beam microscopes equipped with a cryo-stage. We also briefly describe how to integrate fluorescence microscopy data for targeted milling and critical considerations for cryo-ET data acquisition of the lamellae. Users familiar with cryo-electron microscopy who get basic training in dual-beam microscopy can complete the protocol within 2-3 d, allowing for several pause points during the procedure.

Indexed as

Electron Microscope TomographyMechanical PhenomenaAnimalsElectronsMiceNIH 3T3 CellsSpecimen Handling

Identifiers

PMID32405053
PMCPMC8053421
OpenAlexW3024513041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.