Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32404971›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

CNN-Peaks: ChIP-Seq peak detection pipeline using convolutional neural networks that imitate human visual inspection.

Dongpin Oh, J Seth Strattan, Junho K Hur, José Bento, Alexander Eckehart Urban, Giltae Song, J Michael Cherry

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Unsupervised Contrastive Peak Caller for ATAC-seq.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Exploitation of epigenetic variation of crop wild relatives for crop improvement and agrobiodiversity preservation.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Dongpin OhSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, 46241, South Korea.
J Seth StrattanDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, 94305, USA.
Junho K HurSchool of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, 02447, South Korea.
José BentoDepartment of Computer Science, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Philadelphia, MA, 02467, USA.
Alexander Eckehart UrbanDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, 94305, USA.
Giltae SongSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, 46241, South Korea. gsong@pusan.ac.kr.
J Michael CherryDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, 94305, USA.
Stanford University · USPusan National University · KRBoston College · USKyung Hee University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ChIP-seq is one of the core experimental resources available to understand genome-wide epigenetic interactions and identify the functional elements associated with diseases. The analysis of ChIP-seq data is important but poses a difficult computational challenge, due to the presence of irregular noise and bias on various levels. Although many peak-calling methods have been developed, the current computational tools still require, in some cases, human manual inspection using data visualization. However, the huge volumes of ChIP-seq data make it almost impossible for human researchers to manually uncover all the peaks. Recently developed convolutional neural networks (CNN), which are capable of achieving human-like classification accuracy, can be applied to this challenging problem. In this study, we design a novel supervised learning approach for identifying ChIP-seq peaks using CNNs, and integrate it into a software pipeline called CNN-Peaks. We use data labeled by human researchers who annotate the presence or absence of peaks in some genomic segments, as training data for our model. The trained model is then applied to predict peaks in previously unseen genomic segments from multiple ChIP-seq datasets including benchmark datasets commonly used for validation of peak calling methods. We observe a performance superior to that of previous methods.

Indexed as

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation SequencingNeural Networks, ComputerSoftwareAlgorithmsBinding SitesComputational BiologyDatabases, Nucleic AcidEpigenesis, GeneticEpigenomicsHistonesHumansNucleotide MotifsProtein BindingTranscription Initiation SiteHistones

Identifiers

PMID32404971
PMCPMC7220942
OpenAlexW3024571727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.