Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32404951›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2020

The effect of an e-learning module on grading variation of (pre)malignant breast lesions.

Carmen van Dooijeweert, Ivette A G Deckers, Emma J de Ruiter, Natalie D Ter Hoeve, Celien P H Vreuls, Elsken van der Wall, Paul J van Diest

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Detection of grey zones in inter-rater agreement studies.BMC medical research methodology · 2023
    Article
  3. Grading of invasive breast carcinoma: the way forward.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carmen van DooijeweertDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8030-4335
Ivette A G DeckersFoundation PALGA (the nationwide network and registry of histo- and cytopathology in the Netherlands), Houten, the Netherlands.
Emma J de RuiterDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Natalie D Ter HoeveDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Celien P H VreulsDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Elsken van der WallDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Paul J van DiestDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. p.j.vandiest@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0658-2745
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histologic grade is a biomarker that is widely used to guide treatment of invasive breast cancer (IBC) and ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS). Yet, currently, substantial grading variation between laboratories and pathologists exists in daily pathology practice. This study was conducted to evaluate whether an e-learning may be a feasible tool to decrease grading variation of (pre)malignant breast lesions. An e-learning module, representing the key-concepts of grading (pre)malignant breast lesions through gold standard digital images, was designed. Pathologists and residents could take part in either or both the separate modules on DCIS and IBC. Variation in grading of a digital set of lesions before and after the e-learning was compared in a fully-crossed study-design. Multiple outcome measures were assessed: inter-rater reliability (IRR) by Light's kappa, the number of images graded unanimously, the number of images with both extreme scores (i.e., grade I and grade III), and the average number of discrepancies from expert-consensus. Participants were included as they completed both the pre- and post-e-learning set (DCIS-module: n = 36, IBC-module: n = 21). For DCIS, all outcome measures improved after e-learning, with the IRR improving from fair (kappa: 0.532) to good (kappa: 0.657). For IBC, all outcome measures for the subcategories tubular differentiation and mitosis improved, with >90% of participants agreeing on almost 90% of the images after the e-learning. In contrast, the IRR for the subcategory of nuclear pleomorphism remained fair (kappa: 0.523 vs. kappa: 0.571). This study shows that an e-learning module, in which pathologists and residents are trained in histologic grading of DCIS and IBC, is a feasible and promising tool to decrease grading variation of (pre)malignant breast lesions. This is highly relevant given the important role of histologic grading in clinical decision making of (pre)malignant breast lesions.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingComputer-Assisted InstructionEducation, MedicalFemaleHumansNeoplasm GradingPathologistsPathology

Identifiers

PMID32404951
OpenAlexW3024660044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.