Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32404922›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2020

CFTR variant testing: a technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Joshua L Deignan, Caroline Astbury, Garry R Cutting, Daniela Del Gaudio, Anthony R Gregg, Wayne W Grody, Kristin G Monaghan, Sue Richards, ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Noncoding DNA Variants in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: Another Piece of the Diagnostic Puzzle.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. International journal of neonatal screening · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Distinct rates of VUS reclassification are observed when subclassifying VUS by evidence level.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Accurate and Automated Genotyping of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  17. The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Racial inequities and rareJournal of clinical & translational endocrinology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua L DeignanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Caroline AstburyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Garry R CuttingMcKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Daniela Del GaudioDepartment of Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Anthony R GreggDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Wayne W GrodyDepartments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Pediatrics, and Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Kristin G MonaghanGeneDx, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Sue RichardsDepartment of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee
University of California, Los Angeles · USBaylor University Medical Center · USCleveland Clinic · USJohns Hopkins University · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

MOLECULAR GENETICS OF CYSTIC FIBROSISR01DK044003 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Garry R Cutting · 1991 to 2026
$6.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK044003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathogenic variants in the CFTR gene are causative of classic cystic fibrosis (CF) as well as some nonclassic CF phenotypes. In 2001, CF became the first target of pan-ethnic universal carrier screening by molecular methods. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recommended a core panel of 23 disease-causing variants as the minimal set to be included in pan-ethnic carrier screening of individuals with no family history of the disease, and these variants were usually assessed using targeted methods. The original recommendation also left open the option for laboratories to offer expanded CFTR variant panels; however, at the time, expanded CFTR variant panels were met with some controversy on the basis of the available technologies and the limited phenotypic knowledge of rare variants. Both of those aspects have now evolved, prompting this update of the ACMG technical standards for CFTR variant testing.

Indexed as

Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorGenetics, MedicalGenetic TestingGenomicsHumansMutationUnited StatesCFTR protein, humanCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulatorfibrosisgenomepancreatitisscreeningvariant

Identifiers

PMID32404922
PMCPMC8268680
OpenAlexW3025305309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.