Interim schedule for pregnant women and children during the COVID-19 pandemic.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. How do perceptions of Covid-19 risk impact pregnancy-related health decisions? A convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol.PloS one · 2023
   Article
2. Early (years) reactions: comparative analysis of early childhood policies and programs during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC public health · 2022
   Article
3. Adapting obstetric and neonatal services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022
   Article
4. Key concerns among pregnant individuals during the pandemic: Online cross-sectional survey.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as