Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32404430›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2020

Graduated compression stockings as adjuvant to pharmaco-thromboprophylaxis in elective surgical patients (GAPS study): randomised controlled trial.

Joseph Shalhoub, Rebecca Lawton, Jemma Hudson, Christopher Baker, Andrew Bradbury, Karen Dhillon, Tamara Everington, Manjit S Gohel, Zaed Hamady, Beverley J Hunt and 5 more

Abstract readEquivalence TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Elastic stockings for venous thromboembolism prevention, time to go.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Black holes in compression therapy: A quest for data.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Joseph ShalhoubDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London & Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W6 8RF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1011-7440
Rebecca LawtonDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London & Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W6 8RF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3079-4230
Jemma HudsonHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6440-6419
Christopher BakerDepartment of Cardiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Andrew BradburyUniversity of Birmingham & University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0530-9667
Karen DhillonDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London & Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W6 8RF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7209-6089
Tamara EveringtonHampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8886-0280
Manjit S GohelDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London & Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W6 8RF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5685-0723
Zaed HamadyUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4591-5226
Beverley J HuntGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4709-0774
Gerrard StansbyNewcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5539-3049
David WarwickUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3030-442X
John NorrieEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9823-9252
Alun H DaviesDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London & Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W6 8RF, UK a.h.davies@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5261-6913
GAPS trial investigators

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate whether the use of graduated compression stockings (GCS) offers any adjuvant benefit when pharmaco-thromboprophylaxis is used for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing elective surgery.

designOpen, multicentre, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.

settingSeven National Health Service tertiary hospitals in the United Kingdom.

participants1905 elective surgical inpatients (≥18 years) assessed as being at moderate or high risk of venous thromboembolism were eligible and consented to participate.

interventionParticipants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) pharmaco-thromboprophylaxis alone or LMWH pharmaco-thromboprophylaxis and GCS. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was imaging confirmed lower limb deep vein thrombosis with or without symptoms, or pulmonary embolism with symptoms within 90 days of surgery. Secondary outcome measures were quality of life, compliance with stockings and LMWH, lower limb complications related to GCS, bleeding complications, adverse reactions to LMWH, and all cause mortality.

resultsBetween May 2016 and January 2019, 1905 participants were randomised. 1858 were included in the intention to treat analysis (17 were identified as ineligible after randomisation and 30 did not undergo surgery). A primary outcome event occurred in 16 of 937 (1.7%) patients in the LMWH alone group compared with 13 of 921 (1.4%) in the LMWH and GCS group. The risk difference between the two groups was 0.30% (95% confidence interval -0.65% to 1.26%). Because the 95% confidence interval did not cross the non-inferiority margin of 3.5% (P<0.001 for non-inferiority), LMWH alone was confirmed to be non-inferior.

conclusionsFor patients who have elective surgery and are at moderate or high risk of venous thromboembolism, administration of pharmaco-thromboprophylaxis alone is non-inferior to a combination of pharmaco-thromboprophylaxis and GCS. These findings indicate that GCS might be unnecessary in most patients undergoing elective surgery.

trial registrationISRCTN13911492.

Indexed as

Stockings, CompressionAdjuvants, PharmaceuticAdultAgedAnticoagulantsCombined Modality TherapyElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeVenous ThromboembolismAdjuvants, PharmaceuticAnticoagulantsHeparin, Low-Molecular-Weight

Identifiers

PMID32404430
PMCPMC7219517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.