Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32404421›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Behavioral and environmental contributions to drosophilid social networks.

Jacob A Jezovit, Rebecca Rooke, Jonathan Schneider, Joel D Levine

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Movement and Dispersion Parameters Characterizing the Group Behavior ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Indirect genetic effects for social network structure inPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Using Flies to Understand Social Networks.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jacob A JezovitDepartment of Biology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3037-5738
Rebecca RookeDepartment of Biology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0970-2079
Jonathan SchneiderDepartment of Biology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1114-618X
Joel D LevineDepartment of Biology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada joel.levine@utoronto.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-6254-6274
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals interact with each other in species-specific reproducible patterns. These patterns of organization are captured by social network analysis, and social interaction networks (SINs) have been described for a wide variety of species including fish, insects, birds, and mammals. The aim of this study is to understand the evolution of social organization in

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionDrosophilaEnvironmentSocial BehaviorAnimalsFemaleMalePhylogenybehaviorDrosophilaecologyevolutionsocial networks

Identifiers

PMID32404421
PMCPMC7261129
OpenAlexW3025678865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.