Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32404205›Full record

ArticleChiropractic & manual therapies2020

Chiropractic students call for action against unsubstantiated claims.

Joshua Plener, Ben Csiernik, Geronimo Bejarano, Jesper Hjertstrand, Benjamin Goodall

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Joshua PlenerCanadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada. jplener@cmcc.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-5031-5965
Ben CsiernikCanadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada.
Geronimo BejaranoPalmer College of Chiropractic, Florida Campus, 4777 City Center Pkwy, Port Orange, FL, 32129, USA.
Jesper HjertstrandUniversity of South Wales, Treforest Campus, Llantwit Road, Pontypridd, CF37 1DL, UK.
Benjamin GoodallAECC University College, Parkwood Campus, Bournemouth, England, BH5 2DF, UK.
Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College · CAHealth Sciences University · GBPalmer College of Chiropractic · USUniversity of South Wales · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 2019 coronavirus pandemic is a current global health crisis. Many chiropractic institutions, associations, and researchers have stepped up at a time of need. However, a subset of the chiropractic profession has claimed that spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is clinically effective in improving one's immunity, despite the lack of supporting scientific evidence. These unsubstantiated claims contradict official public health policy reflecting poorly on the profession. The aim of this commentary is to provide our perspective on the claims regarding SMT and clinically relevant immunity enhancement, drawing attention to the damaging ramifications these claims might have on our profession's reputation. MAIN TEXT: The World Federation of Chiropractic released a rapid review demonstrating the lack of clinically relevant evidence regarding SMT and immunity enhancement. The current claims contradicting this review carry significant potential risk to patients. Furthermore, as a result of these misleading claims, significant media attention and public critiques of the profession are being made. We believe inaction by regulatory bodies will lead to confusion among the public and other healthcare providers, unfortunately damaging the profession's reputation. The resulting effect on the reputation of the profession is greatly concerning to us, as students.

conclusionIt is our hope that all regulatory bodies will protect the public by taking appropriate action against chiropractors making unfounded claims contradicting public health policy. We believe it is the responsibility of all stakeholders in the chiropractic profession to ensure this is carried out and the standard of care is raised. We call on current chiropractors to ensure a viable profession exists moving forward.

Indexed as

Manipulation, ChiropracticStudents, Health OccupationsChiropracticCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansImmunityPandemicsPneumonia, ViralChiropracticEducationPublic safetyRegulationStudent

Identifiers

PMID32404205
PMCPMC7218504
OpenAlexW3025594403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.