Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32404152›Full record

Observational studyBMC musculoskeletal disorders2020

Predictors of visit frequency for patients using ongoing chiropractic care for chronic low back and chronic neck pain; analysis of observational data.

Patricia M Herman, Sarah E Edgington, Eric L Hurwitz, Ian D Coulter

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia M HermanRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA. pherman@rand.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5579-5654
Sarah E EdgingtonRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Eric L HurwitzOffice of Public Health Studies, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Ian D CoulterRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
RAND Corporation · USUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · US

Funding

Systematic Review Core (SRC)/Ian D. CoulterU19AT007912 · NCCIH · RAND CORPORATION · PI COULTER, IAN DOUGLASS, HERMAN, PATRICIA M · 2013 to 2017
$8.5M
NCCIH NIH HHS 1U19AT007912-01NCCIH NIH HHS U19 AT007912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic spinal pain is prevalent, expensive and long-lasting. Several provider-based nonpharmacologic therapies have now been recommended for chronic low-back pain (CLBP) and chronic neck pain (CNP). However, healthcare and coverage policies provide little guidance or evidence regarding the long-term use of this care. To provide one glimpse into the long-term use of nonpharmacologic provider-based care, this study examines the predictors of visit frequency in a large sample of patients with CLBP and CNP using ongoing chiropractic care.

methodsObservational data were collected from a large national sample of chiropractic patients in the US with non-specific CLBP and CNP. Visit frequency was defined as average number of chiropractic visits per month over the 3-month study period. Potential baseline predictor variables were entered into two sets of multi-level models according to a defined causal theory-in this case, Anderson's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use.

resultsOur sample included 852 patients with CLBP and 705 with CNP. Visit frequency varied significantly by chiropractor/clinic, so our models controlled for this clustering. Patients with either condition used an average of 2.3 visits per month. In the final models visit frequency increased (0.44 visits per month, p = .008) for those with CLBP and some coverage for chiropractic, but coverage had little effect on visits for patients with CNP. Patients with worse function or just starting care also had more visits and those near to ending care had fewer visits. However, visit frequency was also determined by the chiropractor/clinic where treatment was received. Chiropractors who reported seeing more patients per day also had patients with higher visit frequency, and the patients of chiropractors with 20 to 30 years of experience had fewer visits per month. In addition, after controlling for both patient and chiropractor characteristics, the state in which care was received made a difference, likely through state-level policies and regulations.

conclusionsChiropractic patients with CLBP and CNP use a range of visit frequencies for their ongoing care. The predictors of these frequencies could be useful for understanding and developing policies for ongoing provider-based care.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overChronic PainFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLow Back PainMaleManipulation, ChiropracticMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalNeck PainOffice VisitsSelf ReportUnited StatesBehavioral model of health services useChiropractic careChronic low back painChronic neck painVisit frequency

Identifiers

PMID32404152
PMCPMC7222295
OpenAlexW3024018362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.