SynthesisBMC medical ethics2020
Ethical issues and practical barriers in internet-based suicide prevention research: a review and investigator survey.
Synthesis in BMC medical ethics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digital cognitive-behavioural therapy to reduce suicidal ideation and behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data.Evidence-based mental health · 2022Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Mental Health Apps for Distress During COVID-19 in US Unemployed and Essential Workers: Remote Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2022Trial
- Social Media-Based Professional Intervention vs Resource Provision for Youth With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- A comparative cross-sectional study of euthanasia knowledge, attitudes and acceptance among medical students at the University of Ibadan.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Efficacy of a video-viewing intervention of smartphone-based positive word stimulation on depressive symptoms in individuals with subthreshold depression: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026Article
- 'Consider a Less Risky Alternative': Navigating Ethics Approval in Suicide Research.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2025Review
- Exploring the Views of Young People, Including Those With a History of Self-Harm, on the Use of Their Routinely Generated Data for Mental Health Research: Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey Study.JMIR mental health · 2025Article
- Ethics Committees: Structure, Roles, and Issues.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023Review
- Overcoming challenges in adherence and engagement digital interventions: The development of the ALGEApp for chronic pain management.Internet interventions · 2023Article
- Predicting suicide attempts among Norwegian adolescents without using suicide-related items: a machine learning approach.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Editorial: Digital suicide prevention.Frontiers in digital health · 2023Article
- Does Cyberostracism Reduce Prosocial Behaviors? The Protective Role of Psychological Resilience.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Relationships between negative life events and suicidal ideation among youth in China: The direct and moderating effects of offline and online social support from gender perspective.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Professional Care Experiences of Persons With Suicidal Ideation and Behavior: Model Development Based on a Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- Moderated Online Social Therapy for Young People With Active Suicidal Ideation: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Acceptability, Safety, and Resonance of the Pilot Digital Suicide Prevention Campaign "Better Off With You": Qualitative Study.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- The Potential Impact of Adjunct Digital Tools and Technology to Help Distressed and Suicidal Men: An Integrative Review.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Review
- An Enhanced Social Networking Intervention for Young People with Active Suicidal Ideation: Safety, Feasibility and Acceptability Outcomes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Ethical dilemmas encountered in suicide research and management: Experiences of young mental health professionals.Indian journal of medical ethicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeople who are at elevated risk of suicide stand to benefit from internet-based interventions; however, research in this area is likely impacted by a range of ethical and practical challenges. The aim of this study was to examine the ethical issues and practical barriers associated with clinical studies of internet-based interventions for suicide prevention.
methodThis was a mixed-methods study involving two phases. First, a systematic search was conducted to identify studies evaluating internet-based interventions for people at risk of suicide, and information pertaining to safety protocols and exclusion criteria was extracted. Second, investigators on the included studies were invited to complete an online survey comprising open-ended and forced-choice responses. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to analyse the data.
resultsThe literature search identified 18 eligible studies, of which three excluded participants based on severity of suicide risk. Half of the 15 suicide researchers who participated in the survey had experienced problems obtaining ethics approval, and none had encountered adverse events attributed to their intervention. Survey respondents noted the difficulty of managing risk in online environments and the limitations associated with implementing safety protocols, although some also reported increased confidence resulting from the ethical review process. Respondents recommended researchers pursue a collaborative relationship with their research ethics committees.
conclusionThere is a balance to be achieved between the need to minimise the risk of adverse events whilst also ensuring interventions are being validated on populations who may be most likely to use and benefit from them (i.e., those who prefer anonymity). Further research is required to obtain the views of research ethics committees and research participants on these issues. Dialogue between researchers and ethics committees is necessary to address the need to ensure safety while also advancing the timely development of effective interventions in this critical area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.