Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32404098›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical ethics2020

Ethical issues and practical barriers in internet-based suicide prevention research: a review and investigator survey.

Eleanor Bailey, Charlotte Mühlmann, Simon Rice, Maja Nedeljkovic, Mario Alvarez-Jimenez, Lasse Sander, Alison L Calear, Philip J Batterham, Jo Robinson

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical ethics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. 'Consider a Less Risky Alternative': Navigating Ethics Approval in Suicide Research.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Ethics Committees: Structure, Roles, and Issues.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Editorial: Digital suicide prevention.Frontiers in digital health · 2023
    Article
  12. Does Cyberostracism Reduce Prosocial Behaviors? The Protective Role of Psychological Resilience.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Eleanor BaileyOrygen, Locked Bag 10, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia. eleanor.bailey@orygen.org.au.ORCID 0000-0003-4918-1618
Charlotte MühlmannDanish Research Institute for Suicide Prevention, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Gentofte Hospitalsvej 15, 4. Sal, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark.
Simon RiceOrygen, Locked Bag 10, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Maja NedeljkovicCentre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, John St, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia.
Mario Alvarez-JimenezOrygen, Locked Bag 10, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Lasse SanderDepartment of Rehabilitation Psychology and Psychotherapy, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Engelbergerstr. 41, D-79085, Freiburg, Germany.
Alison L CalearCentre for Mental Health Research, Research School of Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2061, Australia.
Philip J BatterhamCentre for Mental Health Research, Research School of Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2061, Australia.
Jo RobinsonOrygen, Locked Bag 10, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUAustralian National University · AUOrygen Youth Health · AUSwinburne University of Technology · AUUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople who are at elevated risk of suicide stand to benefit from internet-based interventions; however, research in this area is likely impacted by a range of ethical and practical challenges. The aim of this study was to examine the ethical issues and practical barriers associated with clinical studies of internet-based interventions for suicide prevention.

methodThis was a mixed-methods study involving two phases. First, a systematic search was conducted to identify studies evaluating internet-based interventions for people at risk of suicide, and information pertaining to safety protocols and exclusion criteria was extracted. Second, investigators on the included studies were invited to complete an online survey comprising open-ended and forced-choice responses. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to analyse the data.

resultsThe literature search identified 18 eligible studies, of which three excluded participants based on severity of suicide risk. Half of the 15 suicide researchers who participated in the survey had experienced problems obtaining ethics approval, and none had encountered adverse events attributed to their intervention. Survey respondents noted the difficulty of managing risk in online environments and the limitations associated with implementing safety protocols, although some also reported increased confidence resulting from the ethical review process. Respondents recommended researchers pursue a collaborative relationship with their research ethics committees.

conclusionThere is a balance to be achieved between the need to minimise the risk of adverse events whilst also ensuring interventions are being validated on populations who may be most likely to use and benefit from them (i.e., those who prefer anonymity). Further research is required to obtain the views of research ethics committees and research participants on these issues. Dialogue between researchers and ethics committees is necessary to address the need to ensure safety while also advancing the timely development of effective interventions in this critical area.

Indexed as

Acceptance and Commitment TherapyAlcoholismInternetMajor Depressive DisorderSuicide PreventionAdolescentAdultAustraliaCohort StudiesEthical ReviewEthics, ResearchHumansPilot ProjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultEthicsInternetResearchSuicide

Identifiers

PMID32404098
PMCPMC7222514
OpenAlexW3024754237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.