Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32404062›Full record

Trial reportBMC gastroenterology2020

Probiotics use for antibiotic-associated diarrhea: a pragmatic participatory evaluation in nursing homes.

Herman A van Wietmarschen, Martine Busch, Annemiek van Oostveen, Gerda Pot, Miek C Jong

Abstract readPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Gut Microbiome Recovery inDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Probiotic OMNi-BiOTiCNutrients · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Herman A van WietmarschenDepartment Nutrition & Health, Louis Bolk Institute, Kosterijland 3-5, 3981, Bunnik, AJ, The Netherlands. h.vanwietmarschen@louisbolk.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2225-0337
Martine BuschVan Praag Institute, Springweg 7, 3511, Utrecht, VH, The Netherlands.
Annemiek van OostveenRivas Zorggroep, Sliedrecht, The Netherlands.
Gerda PotDepartment Nutrition & Health, Louis Bolk Institute, Kosterijland 3-5, 3981, Bunnik, AJ, The Netherlands.
Miek C JongDepartment of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Holmgatan 10, 851 70, Sundsvall, Sweden.

Funding

Winclove BV no number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) occurs in 2-25% of nursing home residents, which may lead to dehydration, malnutrition, severe complications and hospitalizations. Research shows that probiotics can be effective and safe in reducing AAD. However, probiotics are not routinely used in Dutch nursing homes. The objectives of this evaluation were to develop a procedure for the implementation of probiotics to prevent AAD in nursing homes, to evaluate effects on AAD occurrence, and to evaluate the implementation process of probiotics in daily care.

methodsA pragmatic participatory evaluation (PPE) design was chosen, as it seemed a suitable approach for implementation of probiotics, as well as for evaluation of its effectiveness in daily nursing home practice. Probiotics administration was implemented in three nursing homes of the Rivas Zorggroep for residents with somatic and/or psychogeriatric conditions. Ninety-three residents provided data on 167 episodes of antibiotics use, of which 84 episodes that included supplementation with probiotics and 83 episodes with no probiotics supplementation. A multispecies probiotics was administered twice daily upon start of antibiotic treatment, up to 1 week after completing the antibiotics course. The occurrence of AAD was monitored and a process evaluation was conducted to assess facilitators and barriers of probiotics implementation.

resultsThe number of episodes with AAD when using probiotics was significantly lower than when no probiotics was used (20% vs 36%; p = 0,022, Chi-square). No significant differences in the occurrence of AAD were found between the residents taking amoxicillin/clavulanic acid or ciprofloxacin. Reported facilitators for implementation were perceived benefits of probiotics and prescription by medical staff. Reported challenges were probiotics intake by residents and individual decision-making as to which resident would benefit from it.

conclusionSuccessful implementation of probiotics demonstrated the prevention of AAD in nursing home residents.

trial registrationISRCTN 94786163, retrospectively registered on 3 February 2020.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAmoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate CombinationAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinDiarrheaFemaleHomes for the AgedHumansMaleNetherlandsNursing HomesProbioticsTreatment OutcomeAmoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate CombinationAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinAADAntibiotic useElderlyProbioticsPsychogeriatric conditionsSomatic conditionsUrinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID32404062
PMCPMC7222499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.