Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32403445›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Age-Standardized Breast Cancer Detection Rates of Breast Cancer Screening Program by Age Group in Korea; Comparison with Age-Standardized Incidence Rates from the Korea Central Cancer Registry.

Miye Kim, Hyeongsu Kim, Heejung Choi, MiSeon Son, Kun-Sei Lee, Tae-Hwa Han, Sollip Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Miye KimDepartment of Nursing, Graduate school, Konkuk University, Chungju 27478, Korea.
Hyeongsu KimDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.
Heejung ChoiDepartment of Nursing, Graduate school, Konkuk University, Chungju 27478, Korea.
MiSeon SonDepartment of Nursing, Graduate school, Konkuk University, Chungju 27478, Korea.
Kun-Sei LeeDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.
Tae-Hwa HanHealth-IT Center, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea.
Sollip KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Inje University, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang 10380, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare the epidemiological characteristics of a breast cancer screening program of patients between 40-69 years of age and ≥70 years of age, we calculated the age-standardized detection rate of the breast cancer screening program and compared it with the age-standardized incidence rate from the Korea Central Cancer Registry. The data of the breast cancer screening program from January 2009 to December 2016 and the data of the health insurance claims from January 2006 to August 2017 were used. In the 40-69 year age group, the age-standardized detection rate of breast cancer increased annually from 106.1 in 2009 to 158.6 in 2015 and did not differ from the age-standardized incidence rate. In the ≥70 year age group, the age-standardized detection rate of breast cancer increased annually from 65.7 in 2009 to 120.3 in 2015 and was 1.9 to 2.7 fold of the age‑standardized incidence rate. It shows that the early detection effect of breast cancer screening was greater for patients over 70 years old. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of breast cancer detection in the ≥70 year age group on all-cause mortality or breast cancer mortality.

Indexed as

Breast cancerDetection rateIncidence rateScreening

Identifiers

PMID32403445
PMCPMC7349209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.