Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32403157›Full record

ArticleIndoor air2020

Modeling microbial growth in carpet dust exposed to diurnal variations in relative humidity using the "Time-of-Wetness" framework.

Sarah R Haines, Jeffrey A Siegel, Karen C Dannemiller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indoor air, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Indoor bioaerosols and asthma: Overview, implications, and mitigation strategies.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Hyphal growth of Penicillium rubens in changing relative humidity.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah R HainesEnvironmental Science Graduate Program, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3791-6947
Jeffrey A SiegelDepartment of Civil and Mineral Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5904-169X
Karen C DannemillerDepartment of Civil, Environmental & Geodetic Engineering, College of Engineering, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4754-6804

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resuspension of microbes in floor dust and subsequent inhalation by human occupants is an important source of human microbial exposure. Microbes in carpet dust grow at elevated levels of relative humidity, but rates of this growth are not well established, especially under changing conditions. The goal of this study was to model fungal growth in carpet dust based on indoor diurnal variations in relative humidity utilizing the time-of-wetness framework. A chamber study was conducted on carpet and dust collected from 19 homes in Ohio, USA and exposed to varying moisture conditions of 50%, 85%, and 100% relative humidity. Fungal growth followed the two activation regime model, while bacterial growth could not be evaluated using the framework. Collection site was a stronger driver of species composition (P = 0.001, R

Indexed as

Air MicrobiologyAir Pollution, IndoorDustEnvironmental MonitoringFloors and FloorcoveringsFungiHousingHumidityPenicilliumDustcarpetexposurefungihouse dustmoisturemold

Identifiers

PMID32403157
PMCPMC7496831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.