Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32403123›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020

Automated inference of Boolean models from molecular interaction maps using CaSQ.

Sara Sadat Aghamiri, Vidisha Singh, Aurélien Naldi, Tomáš Helikar, Sylvain Soliman, Anna Niarakis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. momapy: a Python library to work with molecular maps.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Non-small cell lung cancer map and analysis: exploring interconnected oncogenic signal integrators.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sara Sadat AghamiriGenHotel, Département de Biologie, Univ. èvry, Université Paris-Saclay, Genopole, èvry 91025, France.
Vidisha SinghGenHotel, Département de Biologie, Univ. èvry, Université Paris-Saclay, Genopole, èvry 91025, France.
Aurélien NaldiDépartement de Biologie, Institut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure (IBENS), ècole Normale Supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, Paris 75005, France.
Tomáš HelikarDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.
Sylvain SolimanLifeware Group, Inria Saclay-île de France, Palaiseau 91120, France.
Anna NiarakisGenHotel, Département de Biologie, Univ. èvry, Université Paris-Saclay, Genopole, èvry 91025, France.

Funding

Software for collaborative construction, simulation, and analysis of mechanistic computational models of biological systemsR35GM119770 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI Tomas Helikar · 2016 to 2026
$4.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM119770
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationMolecular interaction maps have emerged as a meaningful way of representing biological mechanisms in a comprehensive and systematic manner. However, their static nature provides limited insights to the emerging behaviour of the described biological system under different conditions. Computational modelling provides the means to study dynamic properties through in silico simulations and perturbations. We aim to bridge the gap between static and dynamic representations of biological systems with CaSQ, a software tool that infers Boolean rules based on the topology and semantics of molecular interaction maps built with CellDesigner.

resultsWe developed CaSQ by defining conversion rules and logical formulas for inferred Boolean models according to the topology and the annotations of the starting molecular interaction maps. We used CaSQ to produce executable files of existing molecular maps that differ in size, complexity and the use of Systems Biology Graphical Notation (SBGN) standards. We also compared, where possible, the manually built logical models corresponding to a molecular map to the ones inferred by CaSQ. The tool is able to process large and complex maps built with CellDesigner (either following SBGN standards or not) and produce Boolean models in a standard output format, Systems Biology Marked Up Language-qualitative (SBML-qual), that can be further analyzed using popular modelling tools. References, annotations and layout of the CellDesigner molecular map are retained in the obtained model, facilitating interoperability and model reusability. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The present tool is available online: https://lifeware.inria.fr/∼soliman/post/casq/ and distributed as a Python package under the GNU GPLv3 license. The code can be accessed here: https://gitlab.inria.fr/soliman/casq. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

SoftwareSystems BiologyModels, Biological

Identifiers

PMID32403123
PMCPMC7575051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.