Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32401994›Full record

Observational studyRevista Brasileira de terapia intensiva2020

Titration and characteristics of pressure-support ventilation use in Argentina: an online cross-sectional survey study.

Joaquin Pérez, Javier Hernán Dorado, Ana Carolina Papazian, Maricel Berastegui, Daniela Inés Gilgado, Gimena Paola Cardoso, Cristian Cesio, Matías Accoce

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06195475 (Impact of Tidal Volume Magnitude in Pressure Support Mode on Mortality in Adults Under Invasive Mechanical Ventilation. Multi-center Retrospective Cohort Study.), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06195475 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Tidal Volume Magnitude in Pressure Support Mode on Mortality in Adults Under Invasive Mechanical Ventilation. Multi-center Retrospective Cohort Study.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorSanatorio Anchorena San MartinRan2023 to 2024Enrolled2,607ConditionsRespiration, ArtificialArmshigh vs low tidal volume
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joaquin PérezSanatorio Anchorena de San Martín, San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Javier Hernán DoradoSanatorio Anchorena de San Martín, San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ana Carolina PapazianSanatorio Anchorena de San Martín, San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Maricel BerasteguiSanatorio Anchorena de San Martín, San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Daniela Inés GilgadoSanatorio Anchorena de San Martín, San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Gimena Paola CardosoSanatorio Anchorena de San Martín, San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Cristian CesioSanatorio Anchorena de San Martín, San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Matías AccoceSanatorio Anchorena de San Martín, San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify common practices related to the use and titration of pressure-support ventilation (PC-CSV - pressure control-continuous spontaneous ventilation) in patients under mechanical ventilation and to analyze diagnostic criteria for over-assistance and under-assistance. The secondary objective was to compare the responses provided by physician, physiotherapists and nurses related to diagnostic criteria for over-assistance and under-assistance.

methodsAn online survey was conducted using the Survey Monkey tool. Physicians, nurses and physiotherapists from Argentina with access to PC-CSV in their usual clinical practice were included.

resultsA total of 509 surveys were collected from October to December 2018. Of these, 74.1% were completed by physiotherapists. A total of 77.6% reported using PC-CSV to initiate the partial ventilatory support phase, and 43.8% of respondents select inspiratory pressure support level based on tidal volume. The main objective for selecting positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level was to decrease the work of breathing. High tidal volume was the primary variable for detecting over-assistance, while the use of accessory respiratory muscles was the most commonly chosen for under-assistance. Discrepancies were observed between physicians and physiotherapists in relation to the diagnostic criteria for over-assistance.

conclusionThe most commonly used mode to initiate the partial ventilatory support phase was PC-CSV. The most frequently selected variable to guide the titration of inspiratory pressure support level was tidal volume, and the main objective of PEEP was to decrease the work of breathing. Over-assistance was detected primarily by high tidal volume, while under-assistance by accessory respiratory muscles activation. Discrepancies were observed among professions in relation to the diagnostic criteria for over-assistance, but not for under-assistance.

Indexed as

AdultArgentinaCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Care SurveysHumansInternetMiddle AgedPositive-Pressure RespirationRespiration, ArtificialTidal VolumeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32401994
PMCPMC7206961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.