Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32401814›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Low response in eliciting neuraminidase inhibition activity of sera among recipients of a split, monovalent pandemic influenza vaccine during the 2009 pandemic.

Hiroko Ito, Hidekazu Nishimura, Tomoko Kisu, Haruhisa Hagiwara, Oshi Watanabe, Francois Marie Ngako Kadji, Ko Sato, Suguru Omiya, Emi Takashita, Eri Nobusawa

Open access · goldAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroko ItoClinical Research Division, Virus Research Center, National Hospital Organization Sendai Medical Center, Sendai, Japan.
Hidekazu NishimuraClinical Research Division, Virus Research Center, National Hospital Organization Sendai Medical Center, Sendai, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5681-7971
Tomoko KisuClinical Research Division, Virus Research Center, National Hospital Organization Sendai Medical Center, Sendai, Japan.
Haruhisa HagiwaraHagiwara Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Oshi WatanabeClinical Research Division, Virus Research Center, National Hospital Organization Sendai Medical Center, Sendai, Japan.
Francois Marie Ngako KadjiClinical Research Division, Virus Research Center, National Hospital Organization Sendai Medical Center, Sendai, Japan.
Ko SatoClinical Research Division, Virus Research Center, National Hospital Organization Sendai Medical Center, Sendai, Japan.
Suguru OmiyaClinical Research Division, Virus Research Center, National Hospital Organization Sendai Medical Center, Sendai, Japan.
Emi TakashitaInfluenza Virus Research Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Eri NobusawaInfluenza Virus Research Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Sendai Medical Center · JPNational Institute of Infectious Diseases · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibodies against influenza virus neuraminidase (NA) protein prevent releasing of the virus from host cells and spreading of infection foci and are considered the 'second line of defence' against influenza. Haemagglutinin inhibition antibody-low responders (HI-LRs) are present among influenza split vaccine recipients. The NA inhibition (NAI) antibody response in vaccinees is worth exploring, especially those in the HI-LRs population. We collected pre- and post-vaccination sera from 61 recipients of an inactivated, monovalent, split vaccine against A/H1N1pdm09 and acute and convalescent sera from 49 unvaccinated patients naturally infected with the A/H1N1pdm09 virus during the 2009 influenza pandemic. All samples were subjected to haemagglutinin inhibition (HI), NAI and neutralisation assays. Most paired sera from naturally infected patients exhibited marked elevation in the NAI activity, and seroconversion rates (SCR) among HI-LRs and HI-responders (HI-Rs) were 60% and 87%, respectively; however, those from vaccinees displayed low increase in the NAI activity, and the SCR among HI-LRs and HI-Rs were 0% and 12%, respectively. In both HI-LRs and HI-Rs, vaccination with the inactivated, monovalent, split vaccine failed to elicit the NAI activity efficiently in the sera of the naive population, compared with the natural infection. Hence, the improvement of influenza vaccines is warranted to elicit not only HI but also NAI antibodies.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHistory, 21st CenturyHumansInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesJapanMaleMiddle AgedNeuraminidaseAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralInfluenza VaccinesNA protein, influenza A virusNeuraminidaseVaccines, InactivatedViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32401814
PMCPMC7219752
OpenAlexW3025873559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.