Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32401386›Full record

ArticleThe Milbank quarterly2020

Leading Innovative Practice: Leadership Attributes in LEAP Practices.

Benjamin F Crabtree, Jenna Howard, William L Miller, DeANN Cromp, Clarissa Hsu, Katie Coleman, Brian Austin, Margaret Flinter, Leah Tuzzio, Edward H Wagner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Milbank quarterly, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Developing the EQUIPED approach to quality management using multi-grounded theory.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Benjamin F CrabtreeRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School.
Jenna HowardRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School.
William L MillerLehigh Valley Health Network.
DeANN CrompMacColl Center for Health Care Innovation, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute.
Clarissa HsuMacColl Center for Health Care Innovation, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute.
Katie ColemanMacColl Center for Health Care Innovation, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute.
Brian AustinMacColl Center for Health Care Innovation, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute.
Margaret FlinterCommunity Health Center, Inc.
Leah TuzzioMacColl Center for Health Care Innovation, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute.
Edward H WagnerMacColl Center for Health Care Innovation, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Policy Points An onslaught of policies from the federal government, states, the insurance industry, and professional organizations continually requires primary care practices to make substantial changes; however, ineffective leadership at the practice level can impede the dissemination and scale-up of these policies. The inability of primary care practice leadership to respond to ongoing policy demands has resulted in moral distress and clinician burnout. Investments are needed to develop interventions and educational opportunities that target a broad array of leadership attributes. CONTEXT: Over the past several decades, health care in the United States has undergone substantial and rapid change. At the heart of this change is an assumption that a more robust primary care infrastructure helps achieve the quadruple aim of improved care, better patient experience, reduced cost, and improved work life of health care providers. Practice-level leadership is essential to succeed in this rapidly changing environment. Complex adaptive systems theory offers a lens for understanding important leadership attributes.

methodsA review of the literature on leadership from a complex adaptive system perspective identified nine leadership attributes hypothesized to support practice change: motivating others to engage in change, managing abuse of power and social influence, assuring psychological safety, enhancing communication and information sharing, generating a learning organization, instilling a collective mind, cultivating teamwork, fostering emergent leaders, and encouraging boundary spanning. Through a secondary qualitative analysis, we applied these attributes to nine practices ranking high on both a practice learning and leadership scale from the Learning from Effective Ambulatory Practice (LEAP) project to see if and how these attributes manifest in high-performing innovative practices.

findingsWe found all nine attributes identified from the literature were evident and seemed important during a time of change and innovation. We identified two additional attributes-anticipating the future and developing formal processes-that we found to be important. Complexity science suggests a hypothesized developmental model in which some attributes are foundational and necessary for the emergence of others.

conclusionsSuccessful primary care practices exhibit a diversity of strong local leadership attributes. To meet the realities of a rapidly changing health care environment, training of current and future primary care leaders needs to be more comprehensive and move beyond motivating others and developing effective teams.

Indexed as

Health PolicyLeadershipBurnout, ProfessionalHumansPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchStress, PsychologicalUnited Statescomplex adaptive system theoryleadershipprimary carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID32401386
PMCPMC7296441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.