ArticleJMIR research protocols2020
The NASSS-CAT Tools for Understanding, Guiding, Monitoring, and Researching Technology Implementation Projects in Health and Social Care: Protocol for an Evaluation Study in Real-World Settings.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07399106 (EN-CAMHS 2), which is not on this map. Cited by 87 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
EN-CAMHS 2: Enhancing CAMHS Referrals
Who cites it
87 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Implementation of Total Body Photography for Skin Cancer Early Detection: A Systematic Review.International journal of dermatology · 2026Pooled it
- Factors Influencing the Implementation and Adoption of Digital Nursing Technologies: Systematic Umbrella Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- The implementation challenge of computerised clinical decision support systems for the detection of disease in primary care: systematic review and recommendations.Implementation science : IS · 2025Pooled it
- Understanding "Alert Fatigue" in Primary Care: Qualitative Systematic Review of General Practitioners Attitudes and Experiences of Clinical Alerts, Prompts, and Reminders.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Digitally supported interprofessional interaction in healthcare-a scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Pooled it
- Digital technologies to prevent falls in people living with dementia or mild cognitive impairment: a rapid systematic overview of systematic reviews.Age and ageing · 2024Pooled it
- Digital Technologies to Prevent Social Isolation and Loneliness in Dementia: A Systematic Review.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2022Pooled it
- Digital augmentation of aftercare for patients with anorexia nervosa: the TRIANGLE RCT and economic evaluation.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025Trial
- Impacts of a Statewide Prescription Drug Monitoring Program-Healthcare Practitioner Perspectives.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2026Article
- The Nursing Implementation Complexity Tool for Digital Technology Implementation in Nursing: Design Science Research Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- The COMPASS-MS Study on Implementing Digital Assessment and Treatment for Psychological Distress in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: Protocol for a Real-World Longitudinal Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Implementing a Commercial AI Fracture Detection Tool in Health Care Using the Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability Framework: A Formative Evaluation Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Personalized Nutrition in Real-World Vively App Users: Retrospective Observational Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Observational
- Deaf people's experience of the digital transformation of UK healthcare services: a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Understanding digital health technology implementation in rehabilitation and development of the Rehabilitation Technologies Implementation model.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- What Can We Learn From Nurses' Experiences of Digital Technology Implementation During the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Qualitative Study.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Article
- Physicians' expectations of the use of conversational agents in healthcare: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Navigating the complexity of AI adoption in psychotherapy by identifying key facilitators and barriers.Npj mental health research · 2026Article
- Evaluating a Wearable-Based Pain Monitoring System in Palliative Cancer Care: Usability and Feasibility Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Observational
- Article
27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProjects to implement health care and social care innovations involving technologies are typically ambitious and complex. Many projects fail. Greenhalgh et al's nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability (NASSS) framework was developed to analyze the varied outcomes of such projects.
objectiveWe sought to extend the NASSS framework to produce practical tools for understanding, guiding, monitoring, and researching technology projects in health care or social care settings.
methodsBuilding on NASSS and a complexity assessment tool (CAT), the NASSS-CAT tools were developed (in various formats) in seven co-design workshops involving 50 stakeholders (industry executives, technical designers, policymakers, managers, clinicians, and patients). Using action research, they were and are being tested prospectively on a sample of case studies selected for variety in conditions, technologies, settings, scope and scale, policy context, and project goals.
resultsThe co-design process resulted in four tools, available as free downloads. NASSS-CAT SHORT is a taster to introduce the instrument and gauge interest. NASSS-CAT LONG is intended to support reflection, due diligence, and preliminary planning. It maps complexity through stakeholder discussion across six domains, using free-text open questions (designed to generate a rich narrative and surface uncertainties and interdependencies) and a closed-question checklist; this version includes an action planning section. NASSS-CAT PROJECT is a 35-item instrument for monitoring how subjective complexity in a technology implementation project changes over time. NASSS-CAT INTERVIEW is a set of prompts for conducting semistructured research or evaluation interviews. Preliminary data from empirical case studies suggest that the NASSS-CAT tools can potentially identify, but cannot always help reconcile, contradictions and conflicts that block projects' progress.
conclusionsThe NASSS-CAT tools are a useful addition to existing implementation tools and frameworks. Further support of the implementation projects is ongoing. We are currently producing digital versions of the tools, and plan (subject to further funding) to establish an online community of practice for people interested in using and improving the tools, and hold workshops for building cross-project collaborations. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/16861.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.