ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020
Transfer Learning for Risk Classification of Social Media Posts: Model Evaluation Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence-based risk assessment tools for sexual, reproductive and mental health: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- Large Language Models for Mental Health Applications: Systematic Review.JMIR mental health · 2024Pooled it
- Natural language processing in clinical neuroscience and psychiatry: A review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Pooled it
- Large Language Models for Cardiovascular Disease, Cancer, and Mental Disorders: A Review of Systematic Reviews.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Applications of Large Language Models in Mental Health: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Applications of Large Language Models in the Field of Suicide Prevention: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Leveraging reddit data for context-enhanced synthetic health data generation to identify low self esteem.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- The promise of automated machine learning for the genetic analysis of complex traits.Human genetics · 2022Review
- Smartphone-based artificial intelligence using a transfer learning algorithm for the detection and diagnosis of middle ear diseases: A retrospective deep learning study.EClinicalMedicine · 2022Article
- Transfer learning for non-image data in clinical research: A scoping review.PLOS digital health · 2022Article
- Detection of Types of Mental Illness through the Social Network Using Ensembled Deep Learning Model.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- Detecting risk level in individuals misusing fentanyl utilizing posts from an online community on Reddit.Internet interventions · 2021Article
- Comparing Suicide Risk Insights derived from Clinical and Social Media data.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational ScienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMental illness affects a significant portion of the worldwide population. Online mental health forums can provide a supportive environment for those afflicted and also generate a large amount of data that can be mined to predict mental health states using machine learning methods.
objectiveThis study aimed to benchmark multiple methods of text feature representation for social media posts and compare their downstream use with automated machine learning (AutoML) tools. We tested on datasets that contain posts labeled for perceived suicide risk or moderator attention in the context of self-harm. Specifically, we assessed the ability of the methods to prioritize posts that a moderator would identify for immediate response.
methodsWe used 1588 labeled posts from the Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology (CLPsych) 2017 shared task collected from the Reachout.com forum. Posts were represented using lexicon-based tools, including Valence Aware Dictionary and sEntiment Reasoner, Empath, and Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count, and also using pretrained artificial neural network models, including DeepMoji, Universal Sentence Encoder, and Generative Pretrained Transformer-1 (GPT-1). We used Tree-based Optimization Tool and Auto-Sklearn as AutoML tools to generate classifiers to triage the posts.
resultsThe top-performing system used features derived from the GPT-1 model, which was fine-tuned on over 150,000 unlabeled posts from Reachout.com. Our top system had a macroaveraged F1 score of 0.572, providing a new state-of-the-art result on the CLPsych 2017 task. This was achieved without additional information from metadata or preceding posts. Error analyses revealed that this top system often misses expressions of hopelessness. In addition, we have presented visualizations that aid in the understanding of the learned classifiers.
conclusionsIn this study, we found that transfer learning is an effective strategy for predicting risk with relatively little labeled data and noted that fine-tuning of pretrained language models provides further gains when large amounts of unlabeled text are available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.