Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32401193›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

A critical re-evaluation of fMRI signatures of motor sequence learning.

Eva Berlot, Nicola J Popp, Jörn Diedrichsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Motor automaticity in natural keyboard typing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Brain activation for actual and imagined hand movement following bilateral hand transplantation.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025
    Article
  14. Motor Sequence Learning Involves Better Prediction of the Next Action and Optimization of Movement Trajectories.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Continuous Diffusion-Detected Neuroplasticity during Motor Learning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Dissociable Causal Roles of Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex and Primary Motor Cortex over the Course of Motor Skill Development.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eva BerlotThe Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2605-1741
Nicola J PoppThe Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada.
Jörn DiedrichsenThe Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0264-8532

Funding

Canada First Research Excellence Fund BrainsCANNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada NSERC Discovery Grant (RGPIN-2016-04890)Ontario Trillium Foundation Graduate Student ScholarshipOntario Trillium Foundation Graduate Student Scholarship (to EB)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite numerous studies, there is little agreement about what brain changes accompany motor sequence learning, partly because of a general publication bias that favors novel results. We therefore decided to systematically reinvestigate proposed functional magnetic resonance imaging correlates of motor learning in a preregistered longitudinal study with four scanning sessions over 5 weeks of training. Activation decreased more for trained than untrained sequences in premotor and parietal areas, without any evidence of learning-related activation increases. Premotor and parietal regions also exhibited changes in the fine-grained, sequence-specific activation patterns early in learning, which stabilized later. No changes were observed in the primary motor cortex (M1). Overall, our study provides evidence that human motor sequence learning occurs outside of M1. Furthermore, it shows that we cannot expect to find activity increases as an indicator for learning, making subtle changes in activity patterns across weeks the most promising fMRI correlate of training-induced plasticity.

Indexed as

Brain MappingBrain WavesLearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMotor SkillsAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMotor CortexParietal LobePredictive Value of TestsTime FactorsYoung Adulthumanmotor learningneuroimagingneuroscienceplasticityrepresentational fmri analysis

Identifiers

PMID32401193
PMCPMC7266617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.