Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32401171›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2020

Timing of response onset and offset in macaque V4: stimulus and task dependence.

Polina Zamarashkina, Dina V Popovkina, Anitha Pasupathy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Human Insula Reimagined: Single Neurons Respond to Simple Sounds during Passive Listening.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Effects of Partial Occlusion on Response Dynamics and Interregional Processing within Primate Superior Temporal Sulcus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Human insula neurons respond to simple sounds during passive listening.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Responses of neurons in macaque V4 to object and texture images.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Characterizing Spatiotemporal Population Receptive Fields in Human Visual Cortex with fMRI.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Task Context Modulates Feature-Selective Responses in Area V4.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  13. Perceptual Texture Dimensions Modulate Neuronal Response Dynamics in Visual Cortical Area V4.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Visual Functions of Primate Area V4.Annual review of vision science · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Polina ZamarashkinaDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Washington National Primate Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Dina V PopovkinaDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Anitha PasupathyDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Washington National Primate Research Center, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

Washington National Primate Research CenterP51OD010425 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mari Ostendorf · 2012 to 2026
$201.8M
Vision Research CoreP30EY001730 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MAUREEN E NEITZ · 1985 to 2026
$23.5M
The role of area V4 in the perception and recognition of visual objectsR01EY018839 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Anitha Pasupathy · 2009 to 2026
$9.0M
VISUAL SCIENCES TRAINING PROGRAMT32EY007031 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Wyeth Daniel Bair, Anitha Pasupathy · 1985 to 2026
$6.1M
Training Program in Neural Computation and EngineeringR90DA033461 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FAIRHALL, ADRIENNE L, SHEA-BROWN, ERIC TODD · 2011 to 2020
$1.9M
Undergraduate and graduate training in neural computation and engineeringT90DA032436 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FAIRHALL, ADRIENNE L, SHEA-BROWN, ERIC TODD · 2011 to 2020
$1.5M
CRCNS: Joint coding of shape and texture in the primate brianR01EY029997 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PASUPATHY, ANITHA · 2018 to 2020
$724k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001730NEI NIH HHS P30EY01730NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018839NEI NIH HHS R01EY018839NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029997NEI NIH HHS R01EY029997NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007031NEI NIH HHS T32EY007031NIDA NIH HHS R90 DA033461NIH HHS 5R90DA033461-05NIH HHS T90DA032436NIH / ORIP P51OD010425NSF GRFP DGE-1256082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the primate visual cortex, both the magnitude of the neuronal response and its timing can carry important information about the visual world, but studies typically focus only on response magnitude. Here, we examine the onset and offset latency of the responses of neurons in area V4 of awake, behaving macaques across several experiments in the context of a variety of stimuli and task paradigms. Our results highlight distinct contributions of stimuli and tasks to V4 response latency. We found that response onset latencies are shorter than typically cited (median = 75.5 ms), supporting a role for V4 neurons in rapid object and scene recognition functions. Moreover, onset latencies are longer for smaller stimuli and stimulus outlines, consistent with the hypothesis that longer latencies are associated with higher spatial frequency content. Strikingly, we found that onset latencies showed no significant dependence on stimulus occlusion, unlike in inferotemporal cortex, nor on task demands. Across the V4 population, onset latencies had a broad distribution, reflecting the diversity of feedforward, recurrent, and feedback connections that inform the responses of individual neurons. Response offset latencies, on the other hand, displayed the opposite tendency in their relationship to stimulus and task attributes: they are less influenced by stimulus appearance but are shorter in guided saccade tasks compared with fixation tasks. The observation that response latency is influenced by stimulus- and task-associated factors emphasizes a need to examine response timing alongside firing rate in determining the functional role of area V4.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalMacacaPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeSaccadesVisual CortexVisual PathwaysVisual Perceptionprimateresponse latencyspike timingtemporal dynamicsventral pathway

Identifiers

PMID32401171
PMCPMC7311726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.