Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32400869›Full record

ReviewMedical mycology2020

Diagnosing Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia: A review of current methods and novel approaches.

Marjorie Bateman, Rita Oladele, Jay K Kolls

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical mycology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 191 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic tests performance in detecting Pneumocystis jirovecii: A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Evaluation of the ELITe InGenius PCR assay compared with immunofluorescence for Pneumocystis jirovecii detection in respiratory samples.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Advances in pathogen detection ofInfectious medicine · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marjorie BatemanCenter for Translational Research in Infection and Inflammation, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70122, USA.
Rita OladeleDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Nigeria.
Jay K KollsCenter for Translational Research in Infection and Inflammation, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70122, USA.
Tulane University · USUniversity of Lagos · NG

Funding

Improved Therapeutics and Diagnostics for PneumocystisPneumoniaR01AI120033 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JAY K KOLLS · 2016 to 2026
$4.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI120033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pneumocystis jirovecii can cause life-threatening pneumonia in immunocompromised patients. Traditional diagnostic testing has relied on staining and direct visualization of the life-forms in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. This method has proven insensitive, and invasive procedures may be needed to obtain adequate samples. Molecular methods of detection such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), and antibody-antigen assays have been developed in an effort to solve these problems. These techniques are very sensitive and have the potential to detect Pneumocystis life-forms in noninvasive samples such as sputum, oral washes, nasopharyngeal aspirates, and serum. This review evaluates 100 studies that compare use of various diagnostic tests for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) in patient samples. Novel diagnostic methods have been widely used in the research setting but have faced barriers to clinical implementation including: interpretation of low fungal burdens, standardization of techniques, integration into resource-poor settings, poor understanding of the impact of host factors, geographic variations in the organism, heterogeneity of studies, and limited clinician recognition of PCP. Addressing these barriers will require identification of phenotypes that progress to PCP and diagnostic cut-offs for colonization, generation of life-form specific markers, comparison of commercial PCR assays, investigation of cost-effective point of care options, evaluation of host factors such as HIV status that may impact diagnosis, and identification of markers of genetic diversity that may be useful in diagnostic panels. Performing high-quality studies and educating physicians will be crucial to improve the rates of diagnosis of PCP and ultimately to improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

HumansImmunoassayImmunocompromised HostMicrobiological TechniquesPneumocystis cariniiPneumonia, PneumocystisPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificitySpecimen HandlingStaining and Labelingantigen-antibody reactionimmunocompromised hostPneumocystisPneumocystis pneumoniapolymerase chain reaction

Identifiers

PMID32400869
PMCPMC7657095
OpenAlexW3024628859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.