Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32400306›Full record

ArticlePsychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research2020

Coregulation of therapist and client emotion during psychotherapy.

Christina S Soma, Brian R W Baucom, Bo Xiao, Jonathan E Butner, Peter Hilpert, Shrikanth Narayanan, David C Atkins, Zac E Imel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The alliance in mental health care: conceptualization, evidence and clinical applications.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Healing in a Social Context: The Importance of Clinician and Patient Relationship.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. The Loss of the Shared Space: Process Issues in Telepsychotherapy.Indian journal of psychological medicine · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Christina S SomaDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Brian R W BaucomDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Bo XiaoViterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jonathan E ButnerDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Peter HilpertSchool of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guilford, UK.
Shrikanth NarayananViterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
David C AtkinsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Zac E ImelDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
University of Utah · USUniversity of Southern California · USUniversity of Surrey · GBUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Implementation of Technology-Based Evaluation of Motivational InterviewingR01AA018673 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ATKINS, DAVID CHARLES, NARAYANAN, SHRIKANTH · 2010 to 2020
$5.9M
Development and feasibility of computer based fidelity monitoring for MIR34DA034860 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI IMEL, ZACHARY E. · 2013 to 2015
$739k
Using Technology to Scale Up the Evaluation of Motivational InterviewingK02AA023814 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ATKINS, DAVID CHARLES · 2015 to 2019
$690k
NIAAA NIH HHS K02 AA023814NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA018673NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA034860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveClose interpersonal relationships are fundamental to emotion regulation. Clinical theory suggests that one role of therapists in psychotherapy is to help clients regulate emotions, however, if and how clients and therapists serve to regulate each other's emotions has not been empirically tested. Emotion coregulation - the bidirectional emotional linkage of two people that promotes emotional stability - is a specific, temporal process that provides a framework for testing the way in which therapists' and clients' emotions may be related on a moment to moment basis in clinically relevant ways.

methodUtilizing 227 audio recordings from a relationally oriented treatment (Motivational Interviewing), we estimated continuous values of vocally encoded emotional arousal via mean fundamental frequency. We used dynamic systems models to examine emotional coregulation, and tested the hypothesis that each individual's emotional arousal would be significantly associated with fluctuations in the other's emotional state over the course of a psychotherapy session.

resultsResults indicated that when clients became more emotionally labile over the course of the session, therapists became less so. When changes in therapist arousal increased, the client's tendency to become more aroused during session slowed. Alternatively, when changes in client arousal increased, the therapist's tendency to become less aroused slowed.

Indexed as

Emotional RegulationEmotionsProfessional-Patient RelationsPsychotherapyArousalHumansdynamic systemsemotion coregulationpsychotherapytherapeutic relationship

Identifiers

PMID32400306
PMCPMC7233481
OpenAlexW2971630180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.