Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32400203›Full record

ArticleChronobiology international2020

Substrain specific behavioral responses in male C57BL/6N and C57BL/6J mice to a shortened 21-hour day and high-fat diet.

Marissa J Maroni, Kimberly M Capri, Nicole L Arruda, Rachel R Gelineau, Hannah V Deane, Holly A Concepcion, Holly DeCourcey, Isabella K Monteiro De Pina, Alexis V Cushman, Madison H Chasse and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chronobiology international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marissa J MaroniDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University , Bridgewater, Massachusetts, USA.
Kimberly M CapriDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University , Bridgewater, Massachusetts, USA.
Nicole L ArrudaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University , Bridgewater, Massachusetts, USA.
Rachel R GelineauDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University , Bridgewater, Massachusetts, USA.
Hannah V DeaneDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University , Bridgewater, Massachusetts, USA.
Holly A ConcepcionDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University , Bridgewater, Massachusetts, USA.
Holly DeCourceyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University , Bridgewater, Massachusetts, USA.
Isabella K Monteiro De PinaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University , Bridgewater, Massachusetts, USA.
Alexis V CushmanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University , Bridgewater, Massachusetts, USA.
Madison H ChasseDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University , Bridgewater, Massachusetts, USA.
Ryan W LoganTranslational Neuroscience Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8579-015X
Joseph A SeggioDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University , Bridgewater, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7315-1462
Bridgewater State University · USBoston University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Project 5: Circadian RhythmsP50DA039841 · NIDA · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI LAURA G REINHOLDT · 2016 to 2026
$26.2M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA039841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Altered circadian rhythms have negative consequences on health and behavior. Emerging evidence suggests genetics influences the physiological and behavioral responses to circadian disruption. We investigated the effects of a 21 h day (T = 21 cycle), with high-fat diet consumption, on locomotor activity, explorative behaviors, and health in male C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mice. Mice were exposed to either a T = 24 or T = 21 cycle and given standard rodent chow (RC) or a 60% high-fat diet (HFD) followed by behavioral assays and physiological measures. We uncovered numerous strain differences within the behavioral and physiological assays, mainly that C57BL/6J mice exhibit reduced susceptibility to the obesogenic effects of (HFD) and anxiety-like behavior as well as increased circadian and novelty-induced locomotor activity compared to C57BL/6N mice. There were also substrain-specific differences in behavioral responses to the T = 21 cycle, including exploratory behaviors and circadian locomotor activity. Under the 21-h day, mice consuming RC displayed entrainment, while mice exposed to HFD exhibited a lengthening of activity rhythms. In the open-field and light-dark box, mice exposed to the T = 21 cycle had increased novelty-induced locomotor activity with no further effects of diet, suggesting daylength may affect mood-related behaviors. These results indicate that different circadian cycles impact metabolic and behavioral responses depending on genetic background, and despite circadian entrainment.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmDiet, High-FatAnimalsAnxietyLocomotionMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLcircadianhigh-fat dietlocomotor activityMousephotoperiodstrain differences

Identifiers

PMID32400203
PMCPMC7758871
OpenAlexW3025136326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.