Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32400000›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2020

A Multicenter Randomized Three-Arm Phase II Study of (1) Everolimus, (2) Estrogen Deprivation Therapy (EDT) with Leuprolide + Letrozole, and (3) Everolimus + EDT in Patients with Unresectable Fibrolamellar Carcinoma.

Imane El Dika, Robert J Mayer, Alan P Venook, Marinela Capanu, Michael P LaQuaglia, Rachel Kobos, Allison F O'Neill, Joanne F Chou, Michele Ly, Celina Ang and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Treatment and Prognosis of Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Systematic Review of the Recent Literature and Meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A preclinical "magic bullet" against fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma?Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma: A rare but unpleasant event.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022
    Review
  19. A framework for fibrolamellar carcinoma research and clinical trials.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Imane El DikaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Robert J MayerDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Alan P VenookUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Marinela CapanuMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Michael P LaQuagliaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Rachel KobosMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Allison F O'NeillDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Joanne F ChouMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Michele LySidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Celina AngIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Eileen M O'ReillyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
John D GordanUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Ghassan K Abou-AlfaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCornell University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHarvard University · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

lessons learnedFLC is a complex cancer with many implicated oncogenic pathways. Single or dual targeting does not appear to alter the natural history of the cancer, and novel therapeutics are needed. Estrogen deprivation therapy with letrozole and leuprolide, alone or in combination with the mTOR inhibitor, everolimus, did not demonstrate clinical activity in advanced fibrolamellar carcinoma. The study drugs were well tolerated when administered as single agents or in combination in this patient population. This study demonstrates that, despite the rarity of FLC, multicenter therapeutic clinical trials are feasible and support the value of this consortium.

backgroundFibrolamellar carcinoma (FLC) is an uncommon malignancy in young people and is sometimes associated with pregnancy and oral contraceptive use. Immunohistochemical staining and genetic profiling of FLC tumor specimens have revealed aromatase overexpression. The overexpression of mTOR and S6 kinase has been noted in 25% of FLC. On the basis of interaction between estrogen and the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway, we hypothesized that suppression of estrogen and mTOR signaling could have antineoplastic activity in FLC.

methodsPatients were randomized to arm A (everolimus), arm B (letrozole/leuprolide; estrogen deprivation therapy [EDT]), or arm C (everolimus/letrozole/leuprolide). Upon disease progression, patients in arm A or B could proceed to part 2 (everolimus/letrozole/leuprolide). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months (PFS6) assessed using a Simon's minimax two-stage design, hypothesizing an improvement in PFS6 from 40% to 64% with the study regimen.

resultsTwenty-eight patients were enrolled. An unplanned analysis was performed because of perceived concern for lack of efficacy. Stable disease was observed in 9 of 26 evaluable patients (35%). PFS6 was 0%. Median overall survival (OS) was 12.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.4-20.9) for the whole study cohort. Grade 3 adverse events in ≥10% of patients were nausea (11%), vomiting (11%), anemia (11%), elevated aspartate transaminase (AST; 32%), alanine transaminase (ALT; 36%), and alkaline phosphatase (14%). All 28 patients experienced an event for PFS outcome, and four deaths were due to disease progression.

conclusionNeither EDT nor mTOR inhibition improved outcomes in FLC. Other treatment strategies are needed.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularEverolimusAdolescentAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsEstrogensHumansLetrozoleLeuprolidePhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesEstrogensEverolimusLetrozoleLeuprolidePhosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases

Identifiers

PMID32400000
PMCPMC7648371
OpenAlexW3025814925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.