ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
Comparative response of thermophilic and mesophilic sludge digesters to zinc oxide nanoparticles.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The inevitable discharge of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs), from consumer and industrial products, into wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) has created a need to determine their effect on sludge digestion. In this study, the effect of particle size (30 nm and 100 nm), type (coated and non-coated), and dose (6, 75, and 150 mg/g feed total solids (TS)) of ZnO NPs on anaerobic sludge digestion was studied under mesophilic (35 °C) and thermophilic (55 °C) conditions. The effect was investigated in two stages with different digester feeding regime: (1) batch biochemical methane potential (BMP) assays, and (2) semi-continuously fed reactors. Results showed that ZnO NPs were inhibitory at medium and high levels (75 and 100 mg ZnO/g TS, respectively). Coated NPs created less inhibition than non-coated NPs. Thermophilic bacteria were more sensitive to ZnO NPs compared with mesophilic bacteria. For the non-coated ZnO NPs, only the mesophilic batch assays were able to recover at the medium concentration and the thermophilic reactors presented chronic inhibition and could not recover. As a beneficial outcome, coated ZnO NPs significantly reduced odor-causing volatile sulfur compounds in digester headspace in comparison with the non-coated NPs. In summary, the condition in which ZnO NPs would have little to no effect would be 6 mg/g TS-coated ZnO NPs under mesophilic conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.