Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32399856›Full record

ArticleDemography2020

Live Births and Fertility Amid the Zika Epidemic in Brazil.

Letícia J Marteleto, Gilvan Guedes, Raquel Z Coutinho, Abigail Weitzman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Demography, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Childbearing attitudes amid successive novel infectious disease epidemics: a mixed-method experimental approach.Social forces; a scientific medium of social study and interpretation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Conception Preferences during COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdowns.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Letícia J MarteletoPopulation Research Center and Department of Sociology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. marteleto@prc.utexas.edu.
Gilvan GuedesDemography Department and Center for Development and Regional Planning (Cedeplar), Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Raquel Z CoutinhoDemography Department and Center for Development and Regional Planning (Cedeplar), Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Abigail WeitzmanPopulation Research Center and Department of Sociology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.

Funding

Reproductive Responses to the Zika Virus Epidemic in BrazilR01HD091257 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Leticia J Marteleto · 2018 to 2026
$5.8M
Scientific & Technical CoreP2CHD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MARK D. HAYWARD · 2017 to 2026
$5.2M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042849NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD091257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In late 2015, the Brazilian Ministry of Health and the Pan American Health Organization classified the increase in congenital malformations associated with the Zika virus (ZIKV) as a public health emergency. The risk of ZIKV-related congenital syndrome poses a threat to reproductive outcomes that could result in declining numbers of live births and potentially fertility. Using monthly microdata on live births from the Brazilian Information System on Live Births (SINASC), this study examines live births and fertility trends amid the ZIKV epidemic in Brazil. Findings suggest a decline in live births that is stratified across educational and geographic lines, beginning approximately nine months after the link between ZIKV and microcephaly was publicly announced. Although declines in total fertility rates were small, fertility trends estimated by age and maternal education suggest important differences in how Zika might have impacted Brazil's fertility structure. Further findings confirm the significant declines in live births in mid-2016 even when characteristics of the municipality are controlled for; these results highlight important nuances in the timing and magnitude of the decline. Combined, our findings illustrate the value of understanding how the risk of a health threat directed at fetuses has led to declines in live births and fertility.

Indexed as

Age FactorsBirth RateBrazilFemaleHumansLive BirthMicrocephalyPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousResidence CharacteristicsSocioeconomic FactorsZika Virus InfectionBirth ratesBrazilFertilityLatin AmericaZika

Identifiers

PMID32399856
PMCPMC7334083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.