Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32399811›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in therapy2020

Micronized Purified Flavonoid Fraction in Hemorrhoid Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Parvez Sheikh, Varut Lohsiriwat, Yury Shelygin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05750563 (Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Interventional Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of the Food Supplement Microsmin® Plus in the Symptomatic Treatment of Haemorrhoids), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05750563 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicentre, Interventional Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of the Food Supplement Microsmin® Plus in the Symptomatic Treatment of Haemorrhoids

TypeinterventionalSponsorGiellepi S.p.ARan2023 to 2023Enrolled80ConditionsHaemorrhoidsArmsdiosmin and micronized flavonoids, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Parvez SheikhDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Varut LohsiriwatDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. bolloon@hotmail.com.
Yury ShelyginState Scientific Center of Coloproctology, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Saifee Hospital · INSiriraj Hospital · THState Scientific Center of Coloproctology · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHemorrhoidal disease (HD) is a common and recurrent problem for many adults worldwide. Venoactive drugs, such as micronized purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF; Daflon

methodsWe performed a systematic review of the literature to identify randomized clinical trials in which MPFF treatment was compared to placebo or no treatment for acute HD or for relief of symptoms after patients had undergone medical management or a surgical procedure to remove hemorrhoids. The main endpoints investigated were bleeding, pain, pruritus, discharge or leakage, and overall improvement. There was no limit on treatment duration.

resultsFrom 351 unique records retrieved, 11 studies reported in 13 articles were included. On the basis of findings from qualitative analysis, MPFF was reported in most studies to be beneficial in treating bleeding, pain, pruritus, anal discharge/leakage, and tenesmus, and in overall improvement. Quantitative meta-analysis of four studies indicated that MPFF treatment provided significant benefits for bleeding (odds ratio [OR] 0.082, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.027-0.250; P < 0.001), discharge/leakage (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.04-0.42; P < 0.001), and overall improvement according to patients (OR 5.25, 95% CI 2.58-10.68; P < 0.001) and investigators (OR 5.51, 95% CI 2.76-11.0; P < 0.001). MPFF also tended to decrease pain (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01-1.11; P = 0.06).

conclusionTaken together, these results suggest that MPFF treatment can improve the most important signs and symptoms of HD.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiosminFemaleHemorrhoidsHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioRisk AssessmentDiosminHemorrhoidal diseaseHemorrhoidectomyHemorrhoidsMicronized purified flavonoid fractionMPFFVenoactive drugs

Identifiers

PMID32399811
PMCPMC7467450
OpenAlexW3025417223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.