ArticleInternational ophthalmology2020
Evaluation of emulsified silicone oil with spectral domain-optical coherence tomography and fluorescein angiography.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiple imaging modalities in intraocular silicone oil emulsification and its related complications.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Anterior segment optical coherence tomography for the detection of silicone oil emulsification on the iris surface.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- Clinical Features and Possible Origin of Preretinal Deposits in Different Ocular Diseases and Events: A Narrative Review.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Review
- Retinal and Corneal Changes Associated with Intraocular Silicone Oil Tamponade.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Silicone oil emulsification: A literature review and role of widefield imaging and ultra-widefield imaging with navigated central and peripheral optical coherence tomography technology.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo report emulsified particles and related complications after removal of silicone oil (SO) by spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and fluorescein angiography (FA).
methodsA prospective, single-center investigation was performed using SD-OCT, FA and flare cell photometry measurements to evaluate in a cohort of eyes with emulsified silicone particles after removal of long-term SO tamponade.
resultsNineteen eyes of the 19 patients with emulsified silicone particles detected in ophthalmoscopic exam were included in the study: 13 (68%) were male, and 6 (31.6%) were female, and their mean age was 52.75 ± 16.06 years. Preoperative diagnoses were rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in all eyes. The mean duration of the silicone oil's presence in the eye was found as 12.63 ± 4.87 (7-26) months. SD-OCT examination postoperatively showed small, round and hyper-reflective structures compatible with emulsified silicone particles on preretinal surface in 7 (36.8%) eyes, intraretinally in 6 (31.6%) eyes and in the vitreous in 12 (63%) eyes. FA imaging demonstrated pearl-like hyper-fluorescence at early and late phases on the large blood vessels in 9 (47.4%) eyes. Late phase hyper-fluorescence due to leakage on the macula was observed in 17 (89.5%) eyes. Diffuse peripheral leakage and hyper-fluorescence was detected in 11 (57.9%) eyes. Flare levels were higher in eyes with emulsified SO compared to unaffected fellow eyes (p < 0.05).
conclusionsEmulsified silicone particles that remain in the eye may lead to retinal complications and inflammation in addition to their known complications such as keratopathy and glaucoma. The particles that lead to inflammation and presence of inflammation may be examined by imaging methods such as SD-OCT and FA. Removing the SO before emulsification would be suitable for avoiding such complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.