Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32399762›Full record

Observational studyThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2020

Clinical application of four-dimensional noise reduction filtering with a similarity algorithm in dynamic myocardial computed tomography perfusion imaging.

Takanori Kouchi, Yuki Tanabe, Ewoud J Smit, Teruhito Kido, Akira Kurata, Yoshihiro Kouchi, Hikaru Nishiyama, Teruyoshi Uetani, Shuntaro Ikeda, Osamu Yamaguchi and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Takanori KouchiDepartment of Radiology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan.
Yuki TanabeDepartment of Radiology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan. yuki.tanabe.0225@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6782-888X
Ewoud J SmitDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Teruhito KidoDepartment of Radiology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan.
Akira KurataDepartment of Radiology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan.
Yoshihiro KouchiDepartment of Radiology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan.
Hikaru NishiyamaDepartment of Radiology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan.
Teruyoshi UetaniDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonology, Hypertension and Nephrology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan.
Shuntaro IkedaDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonology, Hypertension and Nephrology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan.
Osamu YamaguchiDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonology, Hypertension and Nephrology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan.
Mathias ProkopDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Teruhito MochizukiDepartment of Radiology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the effects of four-dimensional noise reduction filtering using a similarity algorithm (4D-SF) on the image quality and hemodynamic parameter of dynamic myocardial computed tomography perfusion (CTP). Sixty-eight patients who underwent dynamic myocardial CTP for the assessment of coronary artery disease were enrolled. Dynamic CTP was performed using a 320-row CT with low tube voltage scan (80 kVp). Two different datasets of dynamic CTP were reconstructed using iterative reconstruction (IR) alone and a combination of IR and 4D-SF. Qualitative (5-grade scale) and quantitative image quality scores were assessed, and the CT-derived myocardial blood flow (CT-MBF) was quantified. These results were compared between the two different CTP images. The qualitative image quality in CTP images reconstructed with IR and 4D-SF was significantly higher than that with IR alone (noise score: 4.7 vs. 3.4, p < 0.05). The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in CTP images reconstructed with IR and 4D-SF were significantly higher than those with IR alone (SNR: 20.6 vs. 9.7; CNR: 7.9 vs. 3.9, respectively; p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in mean CT-MBF between the two sets of CTP images (3.01 vs. 3.03 mL/g/min, p = 0.1081). 4D-SF showed incremental value in improving image quality in combination with IR without altering CT-MBF quantification in dynamic myocardial CTP imaging with a low tube potential.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary CirculationMultidetector Computed TomographyRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedAgedCoronary Artery DiseaseDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial Perfusion ImagingPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsComputed tomographyComputed tomography perfusionDenoising filterIterative reconstructionMyocardial blood flow

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.