ArticleDer Orthopade2020
[Pseudarthroses].
Article in Der Orthopade, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Synthetic bone replacement substances].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- A case report of upper limb loss of substance: Use of functional gracilis free flap, brachioradialis transposition and bioglass for bone regeneration.Trauma case reports · 2022Article
- Response to Letter to Editor "Comments on the study "The effect of platelet‑rich plasma on fracture healing in long‑bone pseudoarthrosis".European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fractures and osteotomies are characterized by a structural discontinuity of the affected bone with formation of a gap. If bone healing does not lead to an osseous bridging of the fragments within a time period of 6 months a nonunion (pseudarthrosis) occurs. In this stage spontaneous bone healing is unlikely in the future without any intervention. Pseudarthrosis is classified into hypertrophic and atrophic types. Moreover, the differentiation between aseptic and septic conditions, the size of the defect, the local blood supply and the mechanical stability are crucial for treatment planning. The type of pseudarthrosis and the accompanying comorbidities can be classified in scoring systems and influence the selection of the treatment procedure. The operative principles aim at the vitalization of atrophic bone parts, achieving sufficient stabilization and cures the infection, whereas nonoperative measures are primarily supportive measures. The foundation of successful treatment is the minimization of individual risk profiles and sufficient patient compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32399741What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.