ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2020
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of endometrial polypoid lesions.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncovering immune signatures of the endometrium in heavy menstrual bleeding: a cross-sectional study.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2026Article
- Differentiation of early-stage endometrial carcinoma from benign endometrial lesions: a comparative study of six diffusion models.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Evaluating the image quality and local tumor invasion of uterine cancer by MUSE DWI with RPG.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Determination of p53abn endometrial cancer: a multitask analysis using radiological-clinical nomogram on MRI.The British journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: A Pictorial Review on Differential Diagnosis and Not-So-Common Cases of Interventional Radiology Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Different multiparametric MRI-based radiomics models for differentiating stage IA endometrial cancer from benign endometrial lesions: A multicenter study.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Preliminary Application of Magnetization Transfer Imaging in the Study of Normal Uterus and Uterine Lesions.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Diagnostic Value and Clinical Application of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Female Pelvic Lesions.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Uterine leiomyomas revisited with review of literature.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2021Review
- [MRI Findings and Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Tumors of the Uterine Corpus].Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe chi · 2021Review
- Understanding the Endometrium at Menopause: Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Radiologist's View.Journal of mid-life healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endometrial polypoid lesions encompass various conditions from physiologic changes to benign or malignant disease. Differentiating between the various causes of endometrial polypoid lesions remains difficult by transvaginal sonography. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can provide valuable information regarding endometrial polypoid lesions in situations where it is difficult to obtain histologic samples. Multiparametric MRI including T2-weighted images, T1-weighted fat-saturation contrast-enhanced images, and diffusion-weighted images may be helpful for differentiating the various endometrial polypoid lesions and establishing specific diagnoses and appropriate treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32399703What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.