ArticleInternational journal of biometeorology2020
Native influences on the construction of thermal sensation scales.
Article in International journal of biometeorology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Data on verbal expressions for thermal sensation and comfort in the Greek language.Data in brief · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Thermal scales assess thermal environments in terms of thermal sensation and comfort. The number of scale's categories and their verbal realization/labels, especially when translated for local applications, are subjects of research. This study examined variations from the ISO 10551 thermal scale when translated into Greek language. We conducted an online survey asking participants to translate the English ISO 10551 scale, develop their own scales (five, seven and nine-point), report a wording for thermal comfort, and assign discrete values to scales' categories proportional to their perceived distances. Overall, 357 participants enrolled in the survey while data from 321 questionnaires included in the analysis. The interpretations of ISO 10551 categories varied (6-18) although the majority consisted of the exact translation. The wordings of the formulated scales differed from ISO 10551 scale indicating a more intense expression mode. The labels overlapped in the extreme categories of the nine-point scale supporting the use of the seven-point scale. Most participants (~ 65%) reported thermal comfort equivalent to neutrality. About half of the participants reported equal distances between the categories of the scales. The results can be applied on thermal sensation studies having a possible impact on the use of outdoor spaces under various contexts, i.e., public health, urban design, and energy conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32399679What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.