Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32399670›Full record

ReviewDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2020

[Modern systemic therapy for pruritus].

M Metz, M P Pereira

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M MetzDermatologische Allergologie, Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
M P PereiraKompetenzzentrum Chronischer Pruritus (KCP), Klinik für Hautkrankheiten, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Von-Esmarch-Str. 58, 48149, Münster, Deutschland. manuelpedro.pereira@ukmuenster.de.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Hautkrankheiten · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic pruritus (CP) is a highly prevalent, difficult to treat, and burdensome condition. Nowadays, multiple substances are available for the treatment of CP. Systemic therapies play a pivotal role in modern CP therapy, particularly in severe cases and those refractory to general antipruritic measures. Current guidelines recommend the use of a vast array of, mostly off-label, drugs with different mechanisms, including antihistamines, gabapentinoids, antidepressants, immunosuppressive drugs, and μ‑opioid receptor antagonists. The choice of the right agent depends on the indication, safety profile of the drug, and patient-specific features, such as comorbidities and comedication. Owing to a deeper understanding of the pathophysiology of CP, novel drugs have been developed and have already shown anti-pruritic efficacy in clinical studies and case reports. Of note, monoclonal antibodies, neurokinin‑1 receptor antagonists, Janus kinase inhibitors, and opioid receptor modulators are on the frontline of innovative CP treatment. Other promising targets include structures of the peripheral and central nervous system, e.g., histamine 4 receptors, which are involved in itch signaling. This review provides an overview of currently available systemic therapies for CP and their indications and discusses novel innovative agents and promising new targets in CP.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsAntipruriticsHistamine AntagonistsHumansJanus Kinase InhibitorsPruritusAntidepressive AgentsAntipruriticsHistamine AntagonistsJanus Kinase InhibitorsChronic pruritusClinical trialGuidelinesInnovative substancesNovel drugs

Identifiers

PMID32399670
OpenAlexW3024988280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.