Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32399592›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2020

Intraoperative electrochemotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: indications, techniques and results-a single-center experience.

Riccardo Casadei, Claudio Ricci, Carlo Ingaldi, Laura Alberici, Mariacristina Di Marco, Alessandra Guido, Francesco Minni, Carla Serra

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Reversible electroporation for cancer therapy.The British journal of radiology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Riccardo CasadeiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti n.9, 40138, Bologna, Italy. riccardo.casadei@unibo.it.
Claudio RicciDepartment of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti n.9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Carlo IngaldiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti n.9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Laura AlbericiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti n.9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Mariacristina Di MarcoDepartment of Haematology and Oncology (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Alessandra GuidoDepartment of Haematology and Oncology (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Francesco MinniDepartment of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti n.9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Carla SerraDepartment of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti n.9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
University of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLocally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is usually treated with chemoradiotherapy with poor results. The aim of the study was to assess whether intraoperative electrochemotherapy could be proposed as additional therapy in treating LAPC.

methodsObservational study of patients affected by LAPC who underwent intraoperative electrochemotherapy (ECT) after chemoradiotherapy. Data at diagnosis, at restaging and short and long-term outcomes, including assessment of quality of life, were collected for each patient.

resultsFive patients underwent ECT: in four cases, the tumours were located in the head and, in one, in the body of the pancreas. Preoperative chemotherapy consisted mainly of six cycles of modified Folfirinox. At restaging, the serum value of carbohydrate antigen (Ca 19-9) and tumour size were reduced; however, the vascular involvement did not change. No downstaging was recorded. The ECT procedure was performed using at least four needles with a mean duration time of 27 min (range 15-40). No postoperative mortality or major complications were reported. The mean length of stay (LOS) was 8 days (range 5-14). Four patients were alive and well at the end of the study, while one patient died from disease progression. The mean follow-up was 20.8 months (range 9-34) from diagnosis and 9.4 months (range 2-19) from ECT. The quality of life was good and there was improvement in pain/discomfort.

conclusionsElectrochemotherapy could be proposed as a simple, feasible and safe palliative additional treatment in LAPC without progression after chemoradiotherapy. It seems to allow a good quality of life and pain improvement.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBleomycinChemoradiotherapyCombined Modality TherapyElectrochemotherapyElectroporationFemaleHumansIntraoperative CareLaparotomyMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CarePancreatectomyAntineoplastic AgentsBleomycinBleomycinElectrochemotherapyElectroporationLocally advanced pancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID32399592
OpenAlexW3024654286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.