Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32399562›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020

Integrating biological knowledge and gene expression data using pathway-guided random forests: a benchmarking study.

Stephan Seifert, Sven Gundlach, Olaf Junge, Silke Szymczak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Heterogeneous network approaches to protein pathway prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephan SeifertInstitute of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Kiel University, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel 24105, Germany.
Sven GundlachInstitute of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Kiel University, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel 24105, Germany.
Olaf JungeInstitute of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Kiel University, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel 24105, Germany.
Silke SzymczakInstitute of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Kiel University, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel 24105, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationHigh-throughput technologies allow comprehensive characterization of individuals on many molecular levels. However, training computational models to predict disease status based on omics data is challenging. A promising solution is the integration of external knowledge about structural and functional relationships into the modeling process. We compared four published random forest-based approaches using two simulation studies and nine experimental datasets.

resultsThe self-sufficient prediction error approach should be applied when large numbers of relevant pathways are expected. The competing methods hunting and learner of functional enrichment should be used when low numbers of relevant pathways are expected or the most strongly associated pathways are of interest. The hybrid approach synthetic features is not recommended because of its high false discovery rate. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: An R package providing functions for data analysis and simulation is available at GitHub (https://github.com/szymczak-lab/PathwayGuidedRF). An accompanying R data package (https://github.com/szymczak-lab/DataPathwayGuidedRF) stores the processed and quality controlled experimental datasets downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingSoftwareGene ExpressionHumans

Identifiers

PMID32399562
PMCPMC7520048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.