ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2020
Ophthalmic photographer virtual clinics in medical retina.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Primary care optometry-based diabetic retinopathy review clinics - a new model of care and comparison with virtual diabetic retinopathy clinics.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- A Quality Assurance Audit of an Orthoptic-Led Virtual Neuro-Ophthalmology Clinic.The British and Irish orthoptic journal · 2023Article
- Teleophthalmology and Artificial Intelligence As Game Changers in Ophthalmic Care After the COVID-19 Pandemic.Cureus · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo determine whether ophthalmic photographers (OPs) can conduct virtual clinics (VCs) in medical retina appropriately and whether this increases clinic capacity.
methodsThree OPs underwent a training programme to learn how to assess and manage macular edema secondary to diabetes or retinal vein occlusion. The 300 consecutive patients over a 7-month observation period in 2018 were assessed in VCs by both OPs and medical retina consultants. The degree of agreement in treatment decisions between doctors and photographers, as well as adverse events, was recorded. The change in number of patients seen in VCs over two years was also measured.
resultsThere was 100% agreement in management decisions between doctors and photographers during the 300-patient observation period. No adverse events were recorded. In 2017, 572 patients were seen in VCs by doctors. After OP clinics were introduced in 2018, this number increased by 24% to 709 patients seen by both photographers and doctors. There was a significant increase in mean number of patients seen per month between 2017 (47.7±11.7) and 2018 (59.1±14.4;
conclusionOPs can manage certain medical retina patients in VCs appropriately and can increase clinic capacity significantly for particular conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.