ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2020
Evaluation of axis alignment and refractive results of toric phakic IOL using image-guided system.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digital marking versus manual marking technique for toric intraocular lens alignment: a meta-analysis.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence Prediction of Postoperative Rotation Stability After Toric Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Neural network powered microscopic system for cataract surgery.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Femtosecond laser versus manual clear corneal incision in implantable collamer lens surgery.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparison of toric implantable collamer lens alignment accuracy: VERION image-guided system versus manual marking.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- A critical evaluation of longitudinal changes of astigmatism following implantation of toric implantable collamer lens (TICL): a comparison between treated and untreated cases over 4 years.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate accuracy of axis alignment and refractive results of toric phakic intraocular lens (IOL) implantation using a digital imaging system.
methodsThis retrospective study investigated toric implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation in 30 eyes of 21 patients with myopic astigmatism more than 2.0 D guided with digital imaging system. Data were collected during the first week after phakic IOL implantation.
resultsThirty eyes of 21 patients were included in our study. Patients includes 9 males and 12 females. The mean age of the patients was 26.5±7.1 (range 21-44)y. The mean preoperative manifest astigmatism was 3.2±1.7 (range from 2.25 to 4.75) D. The mean postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA) were 0.07±0.07 (range from 0.1 to 0.0) logMAR. The mean postoperative residual refractive cylinder was 0.25±0.29 (range 0-0.75) D. Eyes with postoperative residual refractive cylinder of 0.5 D or less represented 80% (24 eyes). The mean postoperative toric IOL misalignment measured by the OPD scan III was 1.9°±1.45° (range from 0 to 5°).
conclusionImage guided system allows accurate alignment of toric ICL. This is associated with good postoperative visual acuity and low residual refractive astigmatism which correlates with the precision of toric phakic IOL alignment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.