Article3 Biotech2020
Comparative analysis of drought-responsive transcriptomes of sugarcane genotypes with differential tolerance to drought.
Article in 3 Biotech, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deciphering differential mRNA and lncRNA expression profiles in response to PEG simulated drought stress in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.).Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Transcriptome and WGCNA analysis revealed the molecular mechanism of drought resistance in new sugarcane varieties.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Transcriptome Analysis Reveals POD as an Important Indicator for Assessing Low-Temperature Tolerance in Maize Radicles during Germination.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Transcriptomic and Proteomic Landscape of Sugarcane Response to Biotic and Abiotic Stressors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Comparative physiological and transcriptome analysis in cultivated and wild sugarcane species in response to hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Sampling strategies for sugarcane using either clonal replicates or diverse genotypes can bias the conclusions of RNA-Seq studies.Genetics and molecular biology · 2023Article
- Comparative transcriptomic analyses of two sugarcaneFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Candidate regulators of drought stress in tomato revealed by comparative transcriptomic and proteomic analyses.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Genome-wide analysis of respiratory burst oxidase homolog gene family in pea (Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Genome-Wide Identification, Characterization, and Expression Analysis of Glutamate Receptor-like Gene (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Integrated Analysis of Transcriptome and Metabolome Reveals the Regulation of Chitooligosaccharide on Drought Tolerance in Sugarcane (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Review
- A short review on sugarcane: its domestication, molecular manipulations and future perspectives.Genetic resources and crop evolution · 2022Review
- Omics for the Improvement of Abiotic, Biotic, and Agronomic Traits in Major Cereal Crops: Applications, Challenges, and Prospects.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Water stress causes considerable yield losses in sugarcane. To investigate differentially expressed genes under water stress, two sugarcane genotypes were subjected to three water-deficit levels (mild, moderate, and severe) and subsequent recovery and leaf transcriptome was generated using Illumina NextSeq sequencing. Among the differentially expressed genes, the tolerant genotype Co 06022 generated 2970 unigenes (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.