Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32399282›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2020

Jejunostomy at the time of esophagectomy is associated with improved short-term perioperative outcomes: analysis of the NSQIP database.

Michael Watson, Sally Trufan, Jennifer H Benbow, Nicole L Gower, Joshua Hill, Jonathan C Salo

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Randomized controlled trial of nasogastric tube use after esophagectomy: study protocol for the kinetic trial.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael WatsonLevine Cancer Institute, Division of Surgical Oncology, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Sally TrufanDepartment of Biostatistics, Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Jennifer H BenbowLCI Research Support, Clinical Trials Office, Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Nicole L GowerLCI Research Support, Clinical Trials Office, Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Joshua HillLevine Cancer Institute, Division of Surgical Oncology, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Jonathan C SaloLevine Cancer Institute, Division of Surgical Oncology, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Carolinas Medical Center · USLevine Cancer Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adequate preoperative and perioperative nutrition has been shown to improve outcomes for patients undergoing esophagectomy. The most effective way to provide enteral nutrition for patients after esophagectomy is via jejunostomy tube. There is an open debate whether a feeding jejunostomy tube is necessary at the time of esophagectomy. This study evaluated short term surgical outcomes for patients undergoing esophagectomy with and without concurrent jejunostomy tube placement. Esophageal cancer patients were identified from the NSQIP database who underwent esophagectomy between 2005 through 2016. Patients were classified into 2 cohorts: patients with concurrent jejunostomy tube placement and those without jejunostomy placement at the time of esophagectomy. Clinical and demographic data was collected. Differences in short term outcomes were assessed by univariate and multivariable analysis, including prolonged hospital stay (>30 days), in-hospital mortality, and 30-day mortality for both cohorts. We identified 8,632 patients that underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with 80% males and mean age of 63.2±10.6 years. Twenty percent (n=1,723) had preoperative weight loss in the 6-month period preceding surgery. Forty-five percent (n=3,900) patients had jejunostomy placement at the time of esophagectomy. Overall, the rate of prolonged hospital stay (P=0.006), in-hospital mortality (P<0.001) and 30-day mortality (P<0.001) were significantly higher in patients without concurrent jejunostomy in both univariable and multivariable models. This study demonstrates that patients with jejunostomy placement at the time of esophagectomy have improved short term perioperative outcomes.

Indexed as

esophageal cancerEsophagectomyjejunostomyshort-term outcomes

Identifiers

PMID32399282
PMCPMC7212114
OpenAlexW3020469273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.