ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2020
Evaluating treatment protocols for rectal squamous cell carcinomas: the Duke experience and literature.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Primary Rectal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Rare Gastrointestinal Malignancy Presenting As Hematochezia.Cureus · 2026Article
- A case report of rectal squamous cell carcinoma following radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a management dilemma.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Treatment of metastatic rectal squamous cell carcinoma in a pregnant patient.BMJ case reports · 2024Article
- Case report of unusual synchronous anal and rectal squamous cell carcinoma: clinical and therapeutic lesson.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Treatment paradigm and prognostic factor analyses of rectal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Case Report: Intervention of radiotherapy improves the prognosis of rectal squamous cell carcinoma with high PD-L1 expression and enable patients to obtain NED status.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- A Rare Case of Primary Rectal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and the Use of Cytokeratin Markers.Cureus · 2022Article
- Modified DCF (Docetaxel, Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil) chemotherapy is effective for the treatment of advanced rectal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- A Rare Case of Rectal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Nigro Protocol.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2022Article
- Rectal Squamous Cell Cancer.Cureus · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the United States and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Within colorectal cancer histologies, squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) are rare compared to adenocarcinomas, with only about 200 cases reported to date. Because rectal SCC is rarely encountered, there is a lack of literature and clinical consensus surrounding its optimal treatment approach. Staging and management of SCC can be partly analogous to both rectal adenocarcinoma and anal canal SCC, which leads to a dilemma in how to best approach these patients. As large randomized prospective trials are unrealistic in the setting of this rare malignancy, this study evaluates an institutional experience and reviews the existing literature to help guide future management approaches.
methodsThis retrospective study compared various treatment regimens for rectal SCC patients treated at Duke University Medical Center from January 1, 1980 through December 31, 2016. Patients ≥18 years old with histologically confirmed, nonmetastatic rectal SCC were included. Due to small sample size, all statistical analyses were descriptive. For our systematic review, a comprehensive search of PubMed from 1933 to March 2018 was performed, with selected articles referenced to ensure all relevant publications were included. A qualitative analysis was performed to examine patient diagnoses, treatments, and disease- and treatment-related outcomes.
resultsEight patients were included. Three patients underwent initial, curative attempt surgery and two of these patients required colostomy. With follow-up ranging from 7.1 to 31.5 months, one patient was alive with no evidence of disease while two developed local/regional recurrences. Five patients received definitive chemoradiation. Of these, three patients developed local/regional and/or metastatic recurrence. Two patients achieved complete response on imaging and currently remain disease-free (follow-up of 31.5 and 33.6 months).
conclusionsAlthough the review of our institutional experience is limited by small numbers, our analysis suggests that definitive chemoradiation therapy is the preferred treatment approach to rectal SCC based on improved disease-related outcomes, sphincter preservation and morbidity profiles. This conclusion is supported by a systematic literature review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.