ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2020
BRAF-V600E and microsatellite instability prediction through CA-19-9/CEA ratio in patients with colorectal cancer.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical and prognostic implications of RAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Expert consensus on the optimal management of BRAFAsia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Cancer of unknown primary and BRAF V600E meeting the BEACON combination: A case report.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- DNA demethylation triggers cell free DNA release in colorectal cancer cells.Genome medicine · 2024Article
- The role of heavy metals in the development of colorectal cancer.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- A machine learning-based radiomics model for prediction of tumor mutation burden in gastric cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP)-Informed Personalized Molecular Residual Disease (MRD) Detection: An Exploratory Analysis from the PREDATOR Study of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) Patients Undergoing Surgical Resection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Clinical applications of circulating tumor-derived DNA in the management of gastrointestinal cancers - current evidence and future directions.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) serial analysis during progression on PD-1 blockade and later CTLA-4 rescue in patients with mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly identification of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients that are BRAF-V600E mutant and/or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-High), has both prognostic and predictive value. We wanted to highlight an observation of utilizing 2 simple, rapid and universally available lab tests, i.e., carbohydrate cancer antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) tumor markers, the ratio (CA-19-9/CEA) of which can distinctly identify these patients from other molecular subsets of CRC.
methodsAll patients with metastatic CRC from December 2016 to February 2019 were identified, and included in the study if they had both CA19-9 and CEA tests available. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing and tissue genetic testing results were used to categorize patients into BRAF V600E microsatellite stable (MSS), MSI-High, RAS mutant MSS and RAS/RAF wild type CRCs. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the CA19-9/CEA ratio between mutation types and the pairwise p values were adjusted for multiple comparisons with Holm method. For sensitivity analysis, the same analysis was repeated for the mean and median ratio of each patient. All tests were two-sided with alpha level set at 0.05 for statistical significance.
resultsBRAF-V600E MSS CRC patients had a discordantly profound elevation in CA-19-9 levels as opposed to the CEA levels. Patients in the BRAF V600E MSS subset had the highest median CA19-9/CEA ratio versus the least median ratio in MSI-High patients. The median of maximum CA-19-9/CEA ratio was 28.92 (range, 2.76-707.27) in BRAF-V600E MSS patients and 4.06 (range, 0.46-166.74) in MSI-High subset of patients.
conclusionsTo date, this is the first report utilizing the ratio of tumor markers CA19-9/CEA as a predictive rather than just prognostic tool to identify BRAF-V600E MSS and MSI-High CRC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.