Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32399264›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2020

BRAF-V600E and microsatellite instability prediction through CA-19-9/CEA ratio in patients with colorectal cancer.

Pashtoon Murtaza Kasi, Saivaishnavi Kamatham, Faisal Shahjehan, Zhuo Li, Patrick W Johnson, Amit Merchea, Dorin T Colibaseanu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical and prognostic implications of RAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  2. Expert consensus on the optimal management of BRAFAsia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Pashtoon Murtaza KasiDivision of Oncology/Hematology, Division of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Saivaishnavi KamathamDivision of Pathology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Faisal ShahjehanDivision of Internal Medicine, Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center, Johnstown, PA, USA.
Zhuo LiDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Patrick W JohnsonDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Amit MercheaDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Dorin T ColibaseanuDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USConemaugh Health System · USUniversity of Iowa · USWayne State University · USWinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly identification of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients that are BRAF-V600E mutant and/or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-High), has both prognostic and predictive value. We wanted to highlight an observation of utilizing 2 simple, rapid and universally available lab tests, i.e., carbohydrate cancer antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) tumor markers, the ratio (CA-19-9/CEA) of which can distinctly identify these patients from other molecular subsets of CRC.

methodsAll patients with metastatic CRC from December 2016 to February 2019 were identified, and included in the study if they had both CA19-9 and CEA tests available. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing and tissue genetic testing results were used to categorize patients into BRAF V600E microsatellite stable (MSS), MSI-High, RAS mutant MSS and RAS/RAF wild type CRCs. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the CA19-9/CEA ratio between mutation types and the pairwise p values were adjusted for multiple comparisons with Holm method. For sensitivity analysis, the same analysis was repeated for the mean and median ratio of each patient. All tests were two-sided with alpha level set at 0.05 for statistical significance.

resultsBRAF-V600E MSS CRC patients had a discordantly profound elevation in CA-19-9 levels as opposed to the CEA levels. Patients in the BRAF V600E MSS subset had the highest median CA19-9/CEA ratio versus the least median ratio in MSI-High patients. The median of maximum CA-19-9/CEA ratio was 28.92 (range, 2.76-707.27) in BRAF-V600E MSS patients and 4.06 (range, 0.46-166.74) in MSI-High subset of patients.

conclusionsTo date, this is the first report utilizing the ratio of tumor markers CA19-9/CEA as a predictive rather than just prognostic tool to identify BRAF-V600E MSS and MSI-High CRC patients.

Indexed as

BRAF-V600Ecancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9)Colorectal cancer (CRC)ctDNAmicrosatellite instability-high (MSI-High)

Identifiers

PMID32399264
PMCPMC7212105
OpenAlexW3000535103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.