Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32399262›Full record

SynthesisBMJ global health2020

Delivering trauma and rehabilitation interventions to women and children in conflict settings: a systematic review.

Reena P Jain, Sarah Meteke, Michelle F Gaffey, Mahdis Kamali, Mariella Munyuzangabo, Daina Als, Shailja Shah, Fahad J Siddiqui, Amruta Radhakrishnan, Anushka Ataullahjan and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ways to improve surgical outcomes in low- and middle-income countries.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Reena P JainCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7004-5093
Sarah MetekeCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michelle F GaffeyCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mahdis KamaliCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mariella MunyuzangaboCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Daina AlsCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shailja ShahCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Fahad J SiddiquiCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Amruta RadhakrishnanCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Anushka AtaullahjanCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Zulfiqar A BhuttaCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In recent years, more than 120 million people each year have needed urgent humanitarian assistance and protection. Armed conflict has profoundly negative consequences in communities. Destruction of civilian infrastructure impacts access to basic health services and complicates widespread emergency responses. The number of conflicts occurring is increasing, lasting longer and affecting more people today than a decade ago. The number of children living in conflict zones has been steadily increasing since the year 2000, increasing the need for health services and resources. This review systematically synthesised the indexed and grey literature reporting on the delivery of trauma and rehabilitation interventions for conflict-affected populations. Methods: A systematic search of literature published from 1 January 1990 to 31 March 2018 was conducted across several databases. Eligible publications reported on women and children in low and middle-income countries. Included publications provided information on the delivery of interventions for trauma, sustained injuries or rehabilitation in conflict-affected populations. Results: A total of 81 publications met the inclusion criteria, and were included in our review. Nearly all of the included publications were observational in nature, employing retrospective chart reviews of surgical procedures delivered in a hospital setting to conflict-affected individuals. The majority of publications reported injuries due to explosive devices and remnants of war. Injuries requiring orthopaedic/reconstructive surgeries were the most commonly reported interventions. Barriers to health services centred on the distance and availability from the site of injury to health facilities. Conclusions: Traumatic injuries require an array of medical and surgical interventions, and their effective treatment largely depends on prompt and timely management and referral, with appropriate rehabilitation services and post-treatment follow-up. Further work to evaluate intervention delivery in this domain is needed, particularly among children given their specialised needs, and in different population displacement contexts. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019125221.

Indexed as

Armed ConflictsDelivery of Health CareAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedWar-Related Injurieshealth services researchpublic healthsurgerysystematic reviewtraumatology

Identifiers

PMID32399262
PMCPMC7204922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.