Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32399194›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2020

Ulcerative colitis: Recent advances in the understanding of disease pathogenesis.

Ross J Porter, Rahul Kalla, Gwo-Tzer Ho

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 130 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
130citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

130 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. iScience · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Ononin combined withBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

70 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ross J PorterEdinburgh IBD Science Unit, Centre for Inflammation Research, Queens Medical Research Unit, University of Edinburgh, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5043-186X
Rahul KallaEdinburgh IBD Science Unit, Centre for Inflammation Research, Queens Medical Research Unit, University of Edinburgh, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, UK.
Gwo-Tzer HoEdinburgh IBD Science Unit, Centre for Inflammation Research, Queens Medical Research Unit, University of Edinburgh, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6014-372X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel diseases are common, complex, immune-mediated conditions with a sharply rising global prevalence. While major advances since 2000 have provided strong mechanistic clues implicating a de-regulation in the normal interaction among host genetics, immunity, microbiome, and the environment, more recent progress has generated entirely new hypotheses and also further refined older disease concepts. In this review, we focus specifically on these novel developments in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis.

Indexed as

Colitis, UlcerativeFemaleHumansImmunityMaleMicrobiotaInflammationInflammatory Bowel DiseaseMucosal ImmunologyPathogenesisUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID32399194
PMCPMC7194476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.