ReviewF1000Research2018
Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review.
Review in F1000Research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Dissemination planning in exercise oncology trials-a systematic review of trial protocols.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Mapping the Scientific Literature on Sheep and Goat Research: General Appraisal and Significance of the Year of Publication.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Pharmacogenomics in Diabetes: Population-Specific Insights from Colombia.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Hurdles to open access publishing faced by authors: a scoping literature review from 2004 to 2023.Royal Society open science · 2025Review
- Beliefs about social dynamics and open science.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Geographical and disciplinary coverage of open access journals: OpenAlex, Scopus, and WoS.PloS one · 2025Article
- Dissemination of scientific information through open access by research scientists in a developing country.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Article
- Choices of immediate open access and the relationship to journal ranking and publish-and-read deals.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2022Article
- Prevalence of responsible research practices among academics in The Netherlands.F1000Research · 2022Article
- Assessing Open Science practices in physical activity behaviour change intervention evaluations.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2022Article
- The impact of Plan S on scholarly journals from less developed European countries.Croatian medical journal · 2021Article
- Assessing Markers of Reproducibility and Transparency in Smoking Behaviour Change Intervention Evaluations.Journal of smoking cessation · 2021Article
- The gender gap in commenting: Women are less likely than men to comment on (men's) published research.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.